CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 792Memory Processes and InfluencesIdentity, Memory, and TherapyCognitive Functions and Memory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phenomenal characteristics associated with projecting oneself back into the past and forward into the future: Influence of valence and temporal distance

Open access
D’Argembeau, Arnaud, Van der Linden, Martial·2004·Consciousness and Cognition
DOI 10.1016/j.concog.2004.07.007
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

As humans, we frequently engage in mental time travel, reliving past experiences and imagining possible future events. This study examined whether similar factors affect the subjective experience associated with remembering the past and imagining the future. Participants mentally "re-experienced" or "pre-experienced" positive and negative events that differed in their temporal distance from the present (close versus distant), and then rated the phenomenal characteristics (i.e., sensorial, contextual, and emotional details) associated with their representations. For both past and future, representations of positive events were associated with a greater feeling of re-experiencing (or pre-experiencing) than representations of negative events. In addition, representations of temporally close events (both past and future) contained more sensorial and contextual details, and generated a stronger feeling of re-experiencing (or pre-experiencing) than representations of temporally distant events. It is suggested that the way we both remember our past and imagine our future is constrained by our current goals.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.concog.2004.07.007

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 52 references

2 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–700 of 788

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
D’Argembeau, A., & Van der Linden, M.
Affiliations
University of Liège (BE)
Corresponding author
D’Argembeau, Arnaud
ORCID
D’Argembeau, Arnaud
Venue
Consciousness and Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-12
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
844-858
ISSN
1053-8100 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.concog.2004.07.007
OpenAlex
W2054734057
Cited by
792
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 50
FWCI
3.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Consciousness and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
mental time travel, re-experiencing, phenomenal consciousness, temporal distance, event valence, future imagination, goal-directed cognition
MeSH terms
Adult, Deja Vu, Emotions, Female, Goals, Humans, Imagination, Male, Memory, Time Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review