The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Yours or mine? Ownership and memory
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
James, W. (1913) · Henry Holt and Company eBooks · doi:10.1037/11059-000 · Cited by 25,226
Possessions and the Extended Self
Belk, R. W. (1988) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209154 · Cited by 9,064
Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.5.1.193 · Cited by 5,019
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-0626 · Cited by 4,674
Ratcliff, R. (1978) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.85.2.59 · Cited by 4,513
Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.3 · Cited by 3,392
Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science.
Gallagher, S. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01417-5 · Cited by 2,881 · cited 1×
“In particular, a ‘minimal’ sense of self (Gallagher, 2000) has been proposed that serves to distinguish an organism from its immediate external environment (Boyer, Robbins, & Jack, 2005; Gallagher, 2000; Humphrey, 2000; Neisser, 1988).”
BackgroundCohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03204507 · Cited by 2,802
Self-referential processing in our brain—A meta-analysis of imaging studies on the self
Northoff, G., Heinzel, A., de Greck, M., Bermpohl, F., Dobrowolny, H., & Panksepp, J. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.002 · Cited by 2,792
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-5931 · Cited by 2,311
Cited by
The Integrative Self: How Self-Reference Integrates Perception and Memory
Sui, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2015) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.015 · Cited by 502
Sui, J., He, X., & Humphreys, G. W. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/a0029792 · Cited by 441
Extended self: medial prefrontal activity during transient association of self and objects
Kim, K., & Johnson, M. K. (2012) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsq096 · Cited by 104
Extended self: spontaneous activation of medial prefrontal cortex by objects that are “mine”
Kim, K., & Johnson, M. K. (2014) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nst082 · Cited by 78
Negative mood disrupts self- and reward-biases in perceptual matching
Sui, J., Ohrling, E., & Humphreys, G. W. (2016) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2015.1122069 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Cunningham, S. J., Turk, D. J., Macdonald, L. M., & Neil Macrae, C.
- Venue
- Consciousness and Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 312-318
- ISSN
- 1053-8100 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2053002800
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 48
- FWCI
- 1.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Yours or mine? Ownership and memory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.concog.2007.04.003
- The paper
- Cunningham, S. J., Turk, D. J., Macdonald, L. M., & Neil Macrae, C. (2008). Yours or mine? Ownership and memory. Consciousness and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2007.04.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
