Cited by 274Aesthetic Perception and AnalysisAction Observation and SynchronizationNeuroscience and Music Perception

Towards a sensorimotor aesthetics of performing art

Open access
Calvo-Merino, B., Jola, C., Glaser, D.E., Haggard, P.·2008·Consciousness and Cognition

Abstract

The field of neuroaesthetics attempts to identify the brain processes underlying aesthetic experience, including but not limited to beauty. Previous neuroaesthetic studies have focussed largely on paintings and music, while performing arts such as dance have been less studied. Nevertheless, increasing knowledge of the neural mechanisms that represent the bodies and actions of others, and which contribute to empathy, make a neuroaesthetics of dance timely. Here, we present the first neuroscientific study of aesthetic perception in the context of the performing arts. We investigated brain areas whose activity during passive viewing of dance stimuli was related to later, independent aesthetic evaluation of the same stimuli. Brain activity of six naïve male subjects was measured using fMRI, while they watched 24 dance movements, and performed an irrelevant task. In a later session, participants rated each movement along a set of established aesthetic dimensions. The ratings were used to identify brain regions that were more active when viewing moves that received high average ratings than moves that received low average ratings. This contrast revealed bilateral activity in the occipital cortices and in right premotor cortex. Our results suggest a possible role of visual and sensorimotor brain areas in an automatic aesthetic response to dance. This sensorimotor response may explain why dance is widely appreciated in so many human cultures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.concog.2007.11.003

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Calvo-Merino, B., Jola, C., Glaser, D. E., & Haggard, P.
Affiliations
  • City, University of London (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Venue
Consciousness and Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-09
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
911-922
ISSN
1053-8100 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074082098
Cited by
274
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 16
FWCI
3.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Consciousness and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Leverhulme Trust
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Economic and Social Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
neuroaesthetics, dance, aesthetic perception, sensorimotor reactions, passive viewing, aesthetic judgment, premotor cortex, occipital cortex, empathy, performing arts
MeSH terms
Art, Beauty, Brain, Dancing, Empathy, Esthetics, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Psychomotor Performance, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review