Cited by 32Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismReading and Literacy DevelopmentLanguage Development and Disorders

Self-reported inner speech relates to phonological retrieval ability in people with aphasia

Open access
Fama, Mackenzie E., Henderson, Mary P., Snider, Sarah F., Hayward, William, Friedman, Rhonda B., Turkeltaub, Peter E.·2019·Consciousness and Cognition

Abstract

Many individuals with aphasia report the ability to say words in their heads despite spoken naming difficulty. Here, we examined individual differences in the experience of inner speech (IS) in participants with aphasia to test the hypotheses that self-reported IS reflects intact phonological retrieval and that articulatory output processing is not essential to IS. Participants (N = 53) reported their ability to name items correctly internally during a silent picture-naming task. We compared this measure of self-reported IS to spoken picture naming and a battery of tasks measuring the underlying processes required for naming (i.e., phonological retrieval and output processing). Results from three separate analyses of these measures indicate that self-reported IS relates to phonological retrieval and that speech output processes are not a necessary component of IS. We suggest that self-reported IS may be a clinically valuable measure that could assist in clinical decision-making regarding anomia diagnosis and treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.concog.2019.03.005

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inner speech can remain intact alongside failures of overt speech production.

    “Contradictory findings have emerged on how different forms of language loss affect IS, such as evidence that IS can remain intact alongside failures of overt speech production [123].”

    From Inner speech as language process and cognitive tool (2023) · cites this paper as [123]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Hayward W, Snider SF, Luta G, Friedman RB, & Turkeltaub PE (2016). Objective support for subjective reports of successful inner speech in two people with aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3294(August), 1– 16. 10.1080/02643294.2016.1192998 PMC5012953 27469037 · DOI
  2. Sokolov AN (1972). Inner Speech and Thought. (Onischenko GT, Trans.). New York: Plenum Press.
  3. Vygotsky LS (1962). Thought and Language. (Hanfmann E & Vakar G, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fama, M. E., Henderson, M. P., Snider, S. F., Hayward, W., Friedman, R. B., & Turkeltaub, P. E.
Affiliations
  • Georgetown University Medical Center (US)
  • MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Fama, Mackenzie E.
Venue
Consciousness and Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
71
Pages
18-29
ISSN
1053-8100 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2924020107
Cited by
32
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Consciousness and Cognition (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
NIH NIDCD (F31DC014875, R03DC014310)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
inner speech, aphasia, phonological retrieval, anomia, individual differences, speech output
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anomia, Aphasia, Aptitude, Female, Humans, Language, Male, Middle Aged, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Mental Recall, Speech, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review