Cited by 12Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsCancer survivorship and carePalliative and Oncologic Care

Study design and protocol for tailored Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) to optimize quality of life in women living with metastatic breast cancer

Open access
Moreno, Patricia I., Horner, Fiona S., Torzewski, Joanna B., Thomas, Jessica L., Gradishar, William, Victorson, David, Penedo, Frank J.·2022·Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications

Abstract

Women living with metastatic (stage IV) breast cancer face unique challenges, including arduous treatments, side effects, chronic symptom burden, and emotional distress. Nevertheless, most research has paradoxically focused on optimizing quality of life in women with early-stage, non-metastatic breast cancer. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is an evidence-based, third-wave cognitive behavioral therapy that focuses on creating 'a life worth living' by promoting meaning and purpose and optimizing quality of life. ACT may be particularly well-suited for women with metastatic breast cancer as it addresses salient existential concerns, while allowing for the co-occurrence of feelings of grief and loss that are normal and expected when facing a life-limiting prognosis. This manuscript describes the rationale and study design of a pilot randomized controlled trial to develop and assess the feasibility and acceptability of a tailored ACT intervention for women living with metastatic breast cancer. Participants (N = 30) will be randomized 1:1 to either ACT, cognitive behavioral stress management (CBSM), or a usual care control. Both ACT and CBSM are 8-week, group-based interventions that will be delivered online. Primary outcomes are rates of acceptance, retention, and satisfaction. Preliminary effects on variables of interest, including meaning and purpose, psychological flexibility, and several domains of quality of life, will also be examined. Findings will inform the conduct of a full-scale randomized controlled trial of our tailored ACT intervention in women living with metastatic breast cancer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100870

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychological intervention in metastatic breast cancer patients is associated with improved quality of life.

    “Examples of the outcomes of psychological intervention in this group are higher survival rates at ten-year follow-up, decreased depressive symptoms, and improved quality of life in individuals with metastatic breast cancer [19,20,21].”

    From Psychological Intervention and Breast Cancer (2024) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Introduction says stress-management interventions have improved quality of life in women with breast cancer generally. For women with metastatic breast cancer, it reports reduced fatigue and sleep-related impairment after ACT, but not an established improvement in overall quality of life. The Discussion describes quality-of-life improvement in this population as a hypothesis for the proposed trial, not a result. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Focusing on psychological factors such as distress tolerance and death anxiety can effectively reduce the amount of psychological damage in patients.

    “Consequently, focusing on psychological factors such as distress tolerance and death anxiety can effectively reduce the amount of psychological damage in patients (Moreno et al., 2022).”

    From The Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on Distress Tolerance and Death Anxiety in Patients with Lung Cancer (2023) · cites this paper as Moreno et al., 2022

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says ACT may reduce distress in early-stage breast cancer survivors, and the Measures section identifies distress tolerance as a skill targeted by ACT. But this paper is a study protocol, not evidence that targeting distress tolerance and death anxiety effectively reduces psychological harm in patients; it does not report that specific outcome. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Psychological intervention in metastatic breast cancer patients is associated with higher survival rates at ten-year follow-up.

    “Examples of the outcomes of psychological intervention in this group are higher survival rates at ten-year follow-up, decreased depressive symptoms, and improved quality of life in individuals with metastatic breast cancer [19,20,21].”

    From Psychological Intervention and Breast Cancer (2024) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Introduction says survival has increased with life-prolonging and palliative treatments, not psychological intervention. The Discussion describes a planned pilot trial assessing feasibility and quality of life; our copy provides no ten-year survival finding. Searches for ten-year follow-up and survival after psychological intervention found no supporting passage. Page numbers were not available in the indexed copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Psychological intervention in metastatic breast cancer patients is associated with decreased depressive symptoms.

    “Examples of the outcomes of psychological intervention in this group are higher survival rates at ten-year follow-up, decreased depressive symptoms, and improved quality of life in individuals with metastatic breast cancer [19,20,21].”

    From Psychological Intervention and Breast Cancer (2024) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Introduction reports that a pilot ACT intervention in women with metastatic breast cancer decreased fatigue and sleep-related impairment, not depressive symptoms. The Measures section says depression will be assessed in the planned trial, but our copy reports no depression outcome for metastatic breast cancer patients. Searched for depressive symptoms and depression following psychological intervention. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. [2]Seltzer S. Corrigan M. O'Reilly S. The clinicomolecular landscape of de novo versus relapsed stage IV metastatic breast cancer Exp. Mol. Pathol. 114 2020 104404 10.1016/j.yexmp.2020.104404 32067942 · DOI
  2. [3]Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials Lancet 365 2005 1687 1717 15894097
  3. [4]Harris J.R. Lippman M.E. Morrow M. Osborne C.K. Diseases of the Breast second ed. 2000 Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Philadelphia
  4. [5]Mariotto A.B. Etzioni R. Hurlbert M. Penberthy L. Mayer M. Estimation of the number of women living with metastatic breast cancer in the United States Cancer Epidemiol Prev Biomark 26 2017 809 815 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0889 PMC5833304 28522448 · DOI
  5. [6]Caswell-Jin J.L. Plevritis S.K. Tian L. Cadham C.J. Xu C. Stout N.K. Change in survival in metastatic breast cancer with treatment advances: meta-analysis and systematic review JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2 2018 10.1093/jncics/pky062 PMC6305243 30627694 · DOI
  6. [7]Low C.A. Beran T. Stanton A.L. Adaptation in the face of advanced cancer Feuerstein M. Handb. Cancer Surviv 2007 Springer US 211 228
  7. [8]Williamson T.J. Love S.M. DeHart J.N.C. Jorge-Miller A. Eshraghi L. Ortner H.C. Metastatic breast cancer collateral damage project (MBCCD): scale development and preliminary results of the survey of health, impact, needs, and experiences (SHINE) Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 171 2018 75 84 10.1007/s10549-018-4823-x 29767345 PMC6239969 · DOI
  8. [9]Shapiro C.L. Recht A. Side effects of adjuvant treatment of breast cancer N. Engl. J. Med. 344 2001 1997 2008 10.1056/NEJM200106283442607 11430330 · DOI
  9. [10]Helms R.L. O'Hea E.L. Corso M. Body image issues in women with breast cancer Psychol. Health Med. 13 2008 313 325 10.1080/13548500701405509 18569899 · DOI
  10. [11]Crandall C. Petersen L. Ganz P.A. Greendale G.A. Association of breast cancer and its therapy with menopause-related symptoms Menopause 11 2004 519 530 10.1097/01.GME.0000117061.40493.AB 15356404 · DOI
  11. [12]Moreno P.I. Stanton A.L. Personal growth during the experience of advanced cancer: a systematic review Cancer J. 19 2013 421 430 10.1097/PPO.0b013e3182a5bbe7 24051616 · DOI
  12. [13]Ryan R.M. Deci E.L. On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being Annu. Rev. Psychol. 52 2001 141 166 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141 11148302 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [14]Cohen S. Pressman S.D. Positive affect and health Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 15 2006 122 125 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00420.x · DOI · Paper page
  14. [15]Ryff C.D. Keyes C.L.M. The structure of psychological well-being revisited J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 69 1995 719 727 10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719 7473027 · DOI · Paper page
  15. [21]A-Tjak Jgl Davis M.L. Morina N. Powers M.B. Smits J.a.J. Emmelkamp P.M.G. A Meta-analysis of the efficacy of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for clinically relevant mental and physical health problems Psychother. Psychosom. 84 2014 30 36 10.1159/000365764 25547522 · DOI · Paper page
  16. [22]Jiménez F.J.R. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy versus traditional Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current empirical evidence Int. J. Psychol. Psychol. Ther. 12 2012 333 358
  17. [24]Sullivan-Singh S.J. Stanton A.L. Low C.A. Living with limited time: socioemotional selectivity theory in the context of health adversity J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 108 2015 900 25984789 PMC4868189
  18. [25]Breitbart W. Spirituality and meaning in supportive care: spirituality- and meaning-centered group psychotherapy interventions in advanced cancer Support. Care Cancer 10 2002 272 280 10.1007/s005200100289 12029426 · DOI · Paper page
  19. [26]Jim H.S. Andersen B.L. Meaning in life mediates the relationship between social and physical functioning and distress in cancer survivors Br. J. Health Psychol. 12 2007 363 381 10.1348/135910706X128278 17640452 · DOI
  20. [27]Jim H.S. Purnell J.Q. Richardson S.A. Golden-Kreutz D. Andersen B.L. Measuring meaning in life following cancer Qual. Life Res. 15 2006 1355 1371 10.1007/s11136-006-0028-6 16838197 PMC2168592 · DOI · Paper page
  21. [37]Antoni M.H. Lechner S. Diaz A. Vargas S. Holley H. Phillips K. Cognitive behavioral stress management effects on psychosocial and physiological adaptation in women undergoing treatment for breast cancer Brain Behav. Immun. 23 2009 580 591 18835434 PMC2722111
  22. [38]Antoni M.H. Lechner S.C. Kazi A. Wimberly S.R. Sifre T. Urcuyo K.R. How stress management improves quality of life after treatment for breast cancer J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 74 2006 1143 1152 10.1037/0022-006X.74.6.1143 17154743 PMC5752106 · DOI
  23. [39]Antoni M.H. Lechner S. Diaz A. Vargas S. Holley H. Phillips K. Cognitive behavioral stress management effects on psychosocial and physiological adaptation in women undergoing treatment for breast cancer Brain Behav. Immun. 23 2009 580 591 10.1016/j.bbi.2008.09.005 18835434 PMC2722111 · DOI
  24. [40]Antoni M.H. Cruess D.G. Cruess S. Lutgendorf S. Kumar M. Ironson G. Cognitive–behavioral stress management intervention effects on anxiety, 24-hr urinary norepinephrine output, and T-cytotoxic/suppressor cells over time among symptomatic HIV-infected gay men J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 68 2000 31 45 10.1037/0022-006X.68.1.31 10710838 · DOI
  25. [41]Stagl J.M. Bouchard L.C. Lechner S.C. Blomberg B.B. Gudenkauf L.M. Jutagir D.R. Long-term psychological benefits of cognitive-behavioral stress management for women with breast cancer: 11-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial Cancer 121 2015 1873 1881 25809235 PMC4441540
  26. [43]Tang M. Liu X. Wu Q. Shi Y. The effects of cognitive-behavioral stress management for breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Cancer Nurs. 43 2020 222 237 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000804 32195709 · DOI
  27. [45]Thomas D.R. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data Am. J. Eval. 27 2006 237 246 10.1177/1098214005283748 · DOI · Paper page
  28. [49]Salsman J.M. Schalet B.D. Park C.L. George L. Steger M.F. Hahn E.A. Assessing meaning & purpose in life: development and validation of an item bank and short forms for the NIH PROMIS Qual. Life Res. 29 2020 2299 2310 10.1007/s11136-020-02489-3 32306302 PMC7367748 · DOI
  29. [50]Hays R.D. Spritzer K.L. Schalet B.D. Cella D. PROMIS®-29 v2.0 profile physical and mental health summary scores Qual. Life Res. 27 2018 1885 1891 10.1007/s11136-018-1842-3 29569016 PMC5999556 · DOI · Paper page
  30. [51]Brady M.J. Cella D.F. Mo F. Bonomi A.E. Tulsky D.S. Lloyd S.R. Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast quality-of-life instrument J. Clin. Oncol. 15 1997 974 986 10.1200/jco.1997.15.3.974 9060536 · DOI · Paper page
  31. [52]Salsman J.M. Park C.L. Hahn E.A. Snyder M.A. George L.S. Steger M.F. Refining and supplementing candidate measures of psychological well-being for the NIH PROMIS®: qualitative results from a mixed cancer sample Qual. Life Res. 27 2018 2471 2476 10.1007/s11136-018-1896-2 29926344 PMC6677243 · DOI
  32. [55]Fitzmaurice G.M. Laird N.M. Ware J.H. Applied Longitudinal Analysis 2012 John Wiley & Sons
  33. [56]Yost K.J. Eton D.T. Garcia S.F. Cella D. Minimally important differences were estimated for six Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Cancer scales in advanced-stage cancer patients J. Clin. Epidemiol. 64 2011 507 516 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.11.018 21447427 PMC3076200 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moreno, P. I., Horner, F. S., Torzewski, J. B., Thomas, J. L., Gradishar, W., Victorson, D., & Penedo, F. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Moreno, Patricia I.
Venue
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-02
Volume
25
Pages
100870
ISSN
2451-8654 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200205759
Cited by
12
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • American Cancer Society (IRG -18-163-24)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, metastatic breast cancer, quality of life, cognitive-behavioral stress management, psychological flexibility, meaning and purpose, existential concerns, grief and loss, online group intervention, intervention feasibility and acceptability, women with cancer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review