Cited by 100Cancer survivorship and careReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Measuring meaning in life following cancer

Open access
Jim, Heather S., Purnell, Jason Q., Richardson, Susan A., Golden-Kreutz, Deanna, Andersen, Barbara L.·2006·Quality of Life Research

Abstract

Meaning in life is a multi-faceted construct that has been conceptualized in diverse ways. It refers broadly to the value and purpose of life, important life goals, and for some, spirituality. We developed a measure of meaning in life derived from this conceptualization and designed to be a synthesis of relevant theoretical and empirical traditions. Two samples, all cancer patients, provided data for scale development and psychometric study. From exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses the Meaning in Life Scale (MiLS) emerged, and includes four aspects: Harmony and Peace, Life Perspective, Purpose and Goals, Confusion and Lessened Meaning, and Benefits of Spirituality. Supporting data for reliability (internal consistency, test-retest) and construct validity (convergent, discriminant, individual differences) are provided. The MiLS offers a theoretically based and psychometrically sound assessment of meaning in life suitable for use with cancer patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11136-006-0028-6

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Meaning in life is associated with increased QoL in chronic diseases such as cancer and HIV/AIDS.

    “Finally, meaning in life is a relevant psychosocial correlate of physical and mental health, and it is associated with an increased QoL in chronic diseases, such as cancer [30,31,32] and HIV/AIDS infection [33].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [1]Frankl VE. In: Man’s Search for Meaning: An Introduction to Logotherapy (Original work published 1959) Lasch I, editor. New York: Pocket Books; 1963. [Google Scholar]
  2. [16]Starck PL. Patients’ perceptions of the meaning of suffering. Int Forum Logotherapy. 1983;6:110–116. [Google Scholar]
  3. [40]Community health assessments and the center for public health data and statistics [Data File] Columbus, OH: Ohio Department of Health; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  4. [41]Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) [Data File] Rockville, MD: Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  5. [48]McNair DM, Lorr M, Droppleman LF. EITS Manual for the Profile of Mood States. San Diego: Educational and Industrial Testing Service; 1971. [Google Scholar]
  6. [60]Browne MW, Cudeck R, Tateneni K, Mels G. CEFA: Comprehensive Exploratory Factor Analysis. Software. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  7. [62]Nunnally JC, Bernstein LH. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  8. [66]Durkheim E. In: Suicide: A Study of Sociology. Spaulding JA, Simpson G, translators. New York: The Free Press; 1951. [Google Scholar]
  9. [87]Anastasi A, Urbina S. Psychological testing. 7. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1997. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jim, H. S., Purnell, J. Q., Richardson, S. A., Golden-Kreutz, D., & Andersen, B. L.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Andersen, Barbara L.
Venue
Quality of Life Research
Published
2006-07-13
Volume
15
Issue
8
Pages
1355-1371
ISSN
  • 0962-9343 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2649
OpenAlex
W2135906375
Cited by
100
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Quality of Life Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH051487)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA092704, K05CA098133, P30CA016058)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
meaning in life, cancer patients, Meaning in Life Scale, scale development, psychometric validation, spirituality, life goals, meaning of life, worldview
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude to Health, Breast Neoplasms, Data Collection, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Social Support, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Survivors, Value of Life, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review