Cited by 1,190Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsChild Abuse and Trauma

Stress and child development: a review of the Family Stress Model

Open access
Masarik, April S, Conger, Rand D·2017·Current Opinion in Psychology

Abstract

In the present report, we provide an illustrative review of the Family Stress Model (FSM) framework [1] to understand how family stress influences children across development in physical, social-emotional, and cognitive domains. We note that the FSM as a theory has evolved through inspection of: (a) new explanatory pathways (mediators); (b) factors that moderate FSM pathways; and (c) joint tests of competing models. Also important, most researchers cited in this review used longitudinal designs to test the proposed causal ordering of FSM pathways, which replicated among a diverse set of families varied in structure, ethnic background, and geographic location. We encourage continued FSM scholarship with prevention and intervention efforts in mind.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.05.008

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Parenting is influenced by perceptions and beliefs about parenting itself and by the level of parental stress.

    “Parenting is influenced by perceptions and beliefs about parenting itself [24, 26] and the level of parental stress [27, 28].”
  • The family stress model shows that more stressed parents have greater difficulties in providing good-quality cognitive and socioemotional scaffolding and subsequently promoting cognition.

    “Both factors seem to be involved in the family stress model, which shows that more stressed parents have greater difficulties in providing good-quality cognitive and socioemotional scaffolding [29] and, subsequently, promoting cognition [28].”
  • Parental stress has been previously linked to scarcity of resources.

    “Parental stress has also been previously linked to scarcity of resources [28]”
  • The family stress model seems to be related to child development.

    “The family stress model seems to be related to child development [20, 28, 53].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Masarik, A. S., & Conger, R. D.
Affiliations
  • Boise State University (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Masarik, April S
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-02
Volume
13
Pages
85-90
ISSN
2352-250X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2395333007
Cited by
1,190
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 204 · 2025: 224 · 2024: 176 · 2023: 178 · 2022: 150 · 2021: 111 · 2020: 80 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 7
FWCI
3.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholar Works (Boise State University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
family stress model, family stress, child development, social-emotional development, cognitive development, physical development, mediation pathways, moderation, causal pathways, family structure, prevention and intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review