The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.
Mindfulness, acceptance, and emotion regulation: perspectives from Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Experiential acceptance-an orientation of receptivity and noninterference with present-moment experiences-is described as central to mindfulness interventions, yet little experimental work has tested acceptance as a mechanism for mindfulness intervention effects. Guided by Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT), this review situates acceptance as an emotion regulation mechanism and reviews self-report mindfulness literature showing that attention monitoring skills are only associated with beneficial mental and physical health outcomes when accompanied by acceptance skills. New experimental dismantling work shows that removing acceptance training from mindfulness interventions reduces their efficacy for improving stress, positive emotion, and social relationship outcomes. Overall, converging evidence demonstrates that acceptance is a critical emotion regulation mechanism of mindfulness interventions. This work advances basic research, has translational value, and offers opportunities for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Mindfulness, or compassionate acceptance of present-moment experiences, is thought to reduce emotional barriers to advance care planning [30]. By increasing distress tolerance or acceptance of unpleasant thoughts and feelings, mindfulness practices may reduce emotional reactivity during end-of-life discussions [31].”
From Mindfulness to enhance quality of life and support advance care planning: a pilot randomized controlled trial for adults with advanced cancer and their family caregivers. (2024) · cites this paper as [31]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“First, mindfulness practices increase distress tolerance by facilitating compassionate awareness of thoughts and feelings [31].”
From Mindfulness to enhance quality of life and support advance care planning: a pilot randomized controlled trial for adults with advanced cancer and their family caregivers. (2024) · cites this paper as [31]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition.
Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., Segal, Z. V., Abbey, S., Speca, M., Velting, D., et al. (2004) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1093/clipsy.bph077 · Cited by 7,234
Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review
Aldao, A., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Schweizer, S. (2010) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.004 · Cited by 6,686 · cited 1×
“In contrast, ineffective emotion regulation is a core feature of psychopathology [9], and a growing body of evidence relates non-acceptance—including experiential avoidance [10,11], emotional non-acceptance [12], and distress intolerance [13]—with clinical symptoms.”
Loneliness and Social Isolation as Risk Factors for Mortality: A Meta-Analytic Review
Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., Baker, M., Harris, T., & Stephenson, D. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691614568352 · Cited by 6,043
Hölzel, B. K., Lazar, S. W., Gard, T., Schuman-Olivier, Z., Vago, D. R., & Ott, U. (2011) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691611419671 · Cited by 3,024 · cited 1×
“tion as a central mechanism for the effects of mindfulness on mental and physical health outcomes, acting to reduce affective and physiological reactivity and promote recovery [7].”
Hayes, S. C. (2004) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(04)80013-3 · Cited by 2,493
Gu, J., Strauss, C., Bond, R., & Cavanagh, K. (2015) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2015.01.006 · Cited by 1,712 · cited 1×
“And indeed, meta-analytic evidence shows that emotion regulation processes mediate the effects of mindfulness interventions on improvements in mental health [8].”
Kashdan, T. B., Barrios, V., Forsyth, J. P., & Steger, M. F. (2006) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2005.10.003 · Cited by 994 · cited 1×
“In contrast, ineffective emotion regulation is a core feature of psychopathology [9], and a growing body of evidence relates non-acceptance—including experiential avoidance [10,11], emotional non-acceptance [12], and distress intolerance [13]—with clinical symptoms.”
Mechanisms of mindfulness training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT
Lindsay, E. K., & Creswell, J. D. (2017) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2016.10.011 · Cited by 919
Self-citationLeyro, T. M., Zvolensky, M. J., & Bernstein, A. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0019712 · Cited by 868
Garland, E. L., Farb, N. A., R. Goldin, P., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2015) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2015.1064294 · Cited by 810
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Chin B, Lindsay EK, Greco CM, Brown KW, Wright AG, Smyth JM, et al.: Acceptance skills drive stress resilience in a mindfulness training randomized controlled trial. under review.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The plasticity of well-being: A training-based framework for the cultivation of human flourishing
Dahl, C. J., Wilson‐Mendenhall, C. D., & Davidson, R. J. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2014859117 · Cited by 295
Mindful eating: what we know so far
Tapper, K. (2022) · Nutrition Bulletin · doi:10.1111/nbu.12559 · Cited by 118
Defining Mindfulness: A Review of Existing Definitions and Suggested Refinements
Chems-Maarif, R., Cavanagh, K., Baer, R. A., Gu, J., & Strauss, C. (2025) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-024-02507-2 · Cited by 126
The impact of a brief mindfulness training on interoception: A randomized controlled trial
Lima-Araujo, G. L. D., de Sousa Júnior, G. M., Mendes, T., Demarzo, M., Farb, N., Barros de Araujo, D., & Sousa, M. B. C. D. (2022) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0273864 · Cited by 68
Aguilar‐Raab, C., Stoffel, M., Hernández, C., Rahn, S., Moessner, M., Steinhilber, B., & Ditzen, B. (2021) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.13937 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Lindsay, E. K., & Creswell, J. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lindsay, Emily K
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-08
- Volume
- 28
- Pages
- 120-125
- ISSN
- 2352-250X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6565510
- OpenAlex
- W2912349592
- Semantic Scholar
- 59bfb00e1c6bebc9fce0ba1d01462527ca627f0b
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 46 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 1.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Current Opinion in Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- MindRxiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- MindRxiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (R01AT008685, F32AT009508, R21AT008493)
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- mindfulness, acceptance, emotion regulation, attention monitoring, mindfulness-based interventions, stress, positive emotions, interpersonal relationships
- MeSH terms
- Emotional Regulation, Humans, Psychological Theory, Mindfulness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
