Cited by 103Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionDigital Mental Health Interventions

Psychological mechanisms driving stress resilience in mindfulness training: A randomized controlled trial.

Open access
Chin, Brian, Lindsay, Emily K., Greco, Carol M., Brown, Kirk Warren, Smyth, Joshua M., Wright, Aidan G. C., Creswell, J. David·2019·Health Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Mindfulness interventions have been shown to reduce stress; however, the mechanisms driving stress resilience effects are not known. Mindfulness interventions aim to teach individuals how to: (a) use attention to monitor present moment experiences; with (b) an attitude of acceptance and equanimity. A randomized controlled dismantling trial (RCT) was conducted to test the prediction that the removal of acceptance skills training would eliminate stress-reduction benefits of a mindfulness intervention. METHOD: This preregistered RCT randomly assigned stressed community adults to 1 of 3 conditions: (a) Monitor and Accept (MA) mindfulness training, a standard 8-week Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) intervention that provided explicit instruction in developing both monitoring and acceptance skills; (b) Monitor Only (MO) mindfulness training, a well-matched 8-week MBSR intervention that taught monitoring skills only; or (c) No Treatment (NT) control. Stress and nonjudgment were measured using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) for 3 days at baseline and 3 days at postintervention. RESULTS: Consistent with predictions, MA participants increased in nonjudgment and decreased in both stress ratings and the proportion of assessments that they reported experiencing feelings of stress in daily life, relative to both MO and NT participants. CONCLUSIONS: This RCT provides one of the first experimental tests of the mechanisms linking mindfulness interventions with stress resilience. These findings suggest that acceptance skills training may be a necessary active ingredient and support the value of integrating acceptance skills training into stress-reduction interventions. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/hea0000763

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Monitoring and acceptance skills and decentering have been postulated as main mechanisms of change in mindfulness-based interventions.

    “Monitoring and acceptance skills and “decentering” (the ability to observe one’s thoughts and feelings as transient, objective events in the mind) have been postulated as main mechanisms of change (Chin et al., 2019; Moore et al., 2022).”

    From Online Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for People with Parkinson’s Disease and Their Caregivers: a Pilot Study (2022) · cites this paper as Chin et al., 2019

    The paper’s discussion describes monitoring and acceptance as components of mindfulness training and identifies acceptance skills as a possible mechanism for reducing stress. It does not identify decentering as a mechanism of change or describe thoughts and feelings as transient, objective events; a search for “decentering” found no such passage. The cited paper therefore supports only part of the attributed statement. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The mechanism guiding the effects of mindfulness training on mindfulness, depression and insomnia seems to be the increase in mindful attitude towards one's own experience, in particular in terms of acceptance, nonreactivity and nonjudgment.

    “The effects of mindfulness training on mindfulness, depression and insomnia are now quite renowned8,10,21,53 and the mechanism guiding all these changes seems to be the increase in mindful attitude towards one’s own experience, in particular in terms of acceptance, nonreactivity and nonjudgment54–57.”

    From Mindfulness-based online intervention increases well-being and decreases stress after Covid-19 lockdown (2022) · cites this paper as [55]

    The Discussion reports that acceptance training increased non-judgment and may help explain mindfulness training’s stress-reduction benefits. It does not establish this mechanism for changes in depression or insomnia; the Discussion also says the study could not test whether non-judgment mediated the stress effect. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In analyses from the same parent study, all groups showed decreases in momentary stress over time (MA d .85; MO d .59; NT d .44).

    “All groups showed decreases in reports of momentary stress over time (MA: d= .85; MO: d= .59; NT: d=.44).”
  • Ratings of momentary stress and nonjudgment were taken concurrently, which prevented testing the proposed mediation model.

    “ratings of momentary stress and nonjudgment were taken concurrently, which precluded testing of the actual mediation model proposed by these authors.”
  • The articles from the parent study demonstrate that several psychological outcomes (positive affect, stress) were substantially improved with the inclusion of an acceptance skills component.

    “The articles based on this parent study demonstrate that several psychological outcomes (positive affect, stress) were substantially improved with the inclusion of an acceptance skills component”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Cohen S, & Williamson G (1988). Perceived stress in a probability sample of the US In Spacapam S& Oskamp S(Eds.), The social psychology of health: Claremont symposium on applied social psychology (pp. 31– 67). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  2. Smyth JM, & Heron KE (2016). Is providing mobile interventions” just-in-time” helpful? an experimental proof of concept study of just-in-time intervention for stress management. In Wireless Health (pp. 89– 95).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chin, B., Lindsay, E. K., Greco, C. M., Brown, K. W., Smyth, J. M., Wright, A. G. C., & Creswell, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Creswell, J. David
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
2019-08
Volume
38
Issue
8
Pages
759-768
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W2945970821
Cited by
103
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
12.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R21AT008493; R01AT008685, F32AT009508)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
mindfulness training, stress resilience, non-judgment, mindfulness-based stress reduction, attention monitoring, community-dwelling adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Stress, Psychological, Young Adult, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review