Cited by 93Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismHemispheric Asymmetry in NeuroscienceMotor Control and Adaptation

How specialized are writing-specific brain regions? An fMRI study of writing, drawing and oral spelling

Planton, Samuel, Longcamp, Marieke, Péran, Patrice, Démonet, Jean-François, Jucla, Mélanie·2017·Cortex

Abstract

Several brain imaging studies identified brain regions that are consistently involved in writing tasks; the left premotor and superior parietal cortices have been associated with the peripheral components of writing performance as opposed to other regions that support the central, orthographic components. Based on a meta-analysis by Planton, Jucla, Roux, and Demonet (2013), we focused on five such writing areas and questioned the task-specificity and hemispheric lateralization profile of the brain response in an functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment where 16 right-handed participants wrote down, spelled out orally object names, and drew shapes from object pictures. All writing-related areas were activated by drawing, and some of them by oral spelling, thus questioning their specialization for written production. The graphemic/motor frontal area (GMFA), a subpart of the superior premotor cortex close to Exner's area (Roux et al., 2009), was the only area with a writing-specific lateralization profile, that is, clear left lateralization during handwriting, and bilateral activity during drawing. Furthermore, the relative lateralization and levels of activation in the superior parietal cortex, ventral premotor cortex, ventral occipitotemporal cortex and right cerebellum across the three tasks brought out new evidence regarding their respective contributions to the writing processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.11.018

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Handwriting significantly activated the left fusiform area, which is crucial for visual word recognition.

    “Handwriting significantly activated the left fusiform area, which is crucial for visual word recognition.”
  • Planton et al. demonstrated that writing activates a larger visuomotor network compared with typing.

    “This finding is consistent with the work of Planton et al. [5], who demonstrated that writing activates a larger visuomotor network compared with typing, suggesting that multisensory integration plays a crucial role in memory encoding.”
  • Planton et al. on 16 right-handed individuals demonstrated that handwriting led to activations in the left intraparietal sulcus and premotor cortex.

    “A study by Planton et al. [5] on 16 right-handed individuals demonstrated that handwriting led to activations in the left intraparietal sulcus and premotor cortex, indicating involvement in motor control processes.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Planton, S., Longcamp, M., Péran, P., Démonet, J.-F., & Jucla, M.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
  • Laboratoire de NeuroPsychoLinguistique (FR)
Corresponding author
Jucla, Mélanie
Venue
Cortex
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
88
Pages
66-80
ISSN
0010-9452 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2561430989
Cited by
93
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3
FWCI
3.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL AMU (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Maison des Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société de Toulouse
  • Institut des Sciences du Cerveau de Toulouse
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
writing, drawings, superior parietal cortex, ventral premotor cortex, ventral occipitotemporal cortex, cerebellum, hemispheric lateralization, task specificity, orthographic processing, object naming
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Handwriting, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Movement, Reaction Time, Speech, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review