How specialized are writing-specific brain regions? An fMRI study of writing, drawing and oral spelling
Abstract
Several brain imaging studies identified brain regions that are consistently involved in writing tasks; the left premotor and superior parietal cortices have been associated with the peripheral components of writing performance as opposed to other regions that support the central, orthographic components. Based on a meta-analysis by Planton, Jucla, Roux, and Demonet (2013), we focused on five such writing areas and questioned the task-specificity and hemispheric lateralization profile of the brain response in an functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment where 16 right-handed participants wrote down, spelled out orally object names, and drew shapes from object pictures. All writing-related areas were activated by drawing, and some of them by oral spelling, thus questioning their specialization for written production. The graphemic/motor frontal area (GMFA), a subpart of the superior premotor cortex close to Exner's area (Roux et al., 2009), was the only area with a writing-specific lateralization profile, that is, clear left lateralization during handwriting, and bilateral activity during drawing. Furthermore, the relative lateralization and levels of activation in the superior parietal cortex, ventral premotor cortex, ventral occipitotemporal cortex and right cerebellum across the three tasks brought out new evidence regarding their respective contributions to the writing processes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Handwriting significantly activated the left fusiform area, which is crucial for visual word recognition.
“Handwriting significantly activated the left fusiform area, which is crucial for visual word recognition.”
From The Neuroscience Behind Writing: Handwriting vs. Typing—Who Wins the Battle? (2025) · cites this paper as [5]
Planton et al. demonstrated that writing activates a larger visuomotor network compared with typing.
“This finding is consistent with the work of Planton et al. [5], who demonstrated that writing activates a larger visuomotor network compared with typing, suggesting that multisensory integration plays a crucial role in memory encoding.”
From The Neuroscience Behind Writing: Handwriting vs. Typing—Who Wins the Battle? (2025) · cites this paper as [5]
Planton et al. on 16 right-handed individuals demonstrated that handwriting led to activations in the left intraparietal sulcus and premotor cortex.
“A study by Planton et al. [5] on 16 right-handed individuals demonstrated that handwriting led to activations in the left intraparietal sulcus and premotor cortex, indicating involvement in motor control processes.”
From The Neuroscience Behind Writing: Handwriting vs. Typing—Who Wins the Battle? (2025) · cites this paper as [5]
Cites
‘What’ and ‘where’ in the human brain
Ungerleider, L. G., & Haxby, J. V. (1994) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/0959-4388(94)90066-3 · Cited by 1,913 · see citing works
The visual word form area: a prelexical representation of visual words in the fusiform gyrus
Dehaene, S., Le Clec’H, G., Poline, J.-B., Le Bihan, D., & Cohen, L. (2002) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/00001756-200203040-00015 · Cited by 727 · see citing works
Illiterate to literate: behavioural and cerebral changes induced by reading acquisition
Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Morais, J., & Kolinsky, R. (2015) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3924 · Cited by 716 · see citing works
The cerebellum and language: historical perspective and review
Murdoch, B. E. (2010) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2009.07.018 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
The “visual word form area” is involved in successful memory encoding of both words and faces
Mei, L., Xue, G., Chen, C., Xue, F., Zhang, M., & Dong, Q. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.067 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ose Askvik, E., van der Weel, F. R. (., & van der Meer, A. L. H. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01810 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
The Neuroscience Behind Writing: Handwriting vs. Typing—Who Wins the Battle?
Marano, G., Kotzalidis, G. D., Lisci, F. M., Anesini, M. B., Rossi, S., Barbonetti, S., Cangini, A., Ronsisvalle, A., Artuso, L., Falsini, C., et al. (2025) · Life · doi:10.3390/life15030345 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Planton, S., Longcamp, M., Péran, P., Démonet, J.-F., & Jucla, M.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
- Laboratoire de NeuroPsychoLinguistique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Jucla, Mélanie
- Venue
- Cortex
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-03
- Volume
- 88
- Pages
- 66-80
- ISSN
- 0010-9452 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2561430989
- Cited by
- 93
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 3.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cortex (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL AMU (submittedVersion)
- IRIS (submittedVersion)
- SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Maison des Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société de Toulouse
- Institut des Sciences du Cerveau de Toulouse
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Keywords
- writing, drawings, superior parietal cortex, ventral premotor cortex, ventral occipitotemporal cortex, cerebellum, hemispheric lateralization, task specificity, orthographic processing, object naming
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Handwriting, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Movement, Reaction Time, Speech, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review