The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determining employee awareness using the Human Aspects of Information Security Questionnaire (HAIS-Q)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002) · Environmental Education Research · doi:10.1080/13504620220145401 · Cited by 8,866
A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains
Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. (2003) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/s0092-6566(03)00046-1 · Cited by 8,307
Mathieson, K. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.173 · Cited by 4,216
Identifying careless responses in survey data.
Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. B. (2012) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0028085 · Cited by 3,865
Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research
Straub, D., & Gefen, D. (2004) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.01324 · Cited by 2,797
International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Contents of Previous Volumes
(2003) · International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2004 · doi:10.1002/0470013311.oth1 · Cited by 2,762
Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design
Willis, G. (2004) · Cited by 1,934
Pretesting survey instruments: An overview of cognitive methods
Collins, D. (2003) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1023/a:1023254226592 · Cited by 1,506
Cited by
Individual differences and Information Security Awareness
McCormac, A., Zwaans, T., Parsons, K., Calic, D., Butavicius, M., & Pattinson, M. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.065 · Cited by 300
Self-citationAn information security knowledge sharing model in organizations
Safa, N. S., & Von Solms, R. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.037 · Cited by 256
Holistic cyber hygiene education: Accounting for the human factors
Neigel, A. R., Claypoole, V. L., Waldfogle, G. E., Acharya, S., & Hancock, G. M. (2020) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2020.101731 · Cited by 75
The “Human Factor” in Cybersecurity: Exploring the Accidental Insider
Hadlington, L. (2018) · Advances in Digital Crime, Forensics, and Cyber Terrorism · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-4053-3.ch003 · Cited by 46
Cyber Hygiene: The Big Picture
Maennel, K., Mäses, S., & Maennel, O. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-03638-6_18 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Parsons, K., McCormac, A., Butavicius, M., Pattinson, M., & Jerram, C.
- Venue
- Computers & Security
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-05
- Volume
- 42
- Pages
- 165-176
- ISSN
- 0167-4048 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2029699977
- Cited by
- 437
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 51.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determining employee awareness using the Human Aspects of Information Security Questionnaire (HAIS-Q). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cose.2013.12.003
- The paper
- Parsons, K., McCormac, A., Butavicius, M., Pattinson, M., & Jerram, C. (2014). Determining employee awareness using the Human Aspects of Information Security Questionnaire (HAIS-Q). Computers & Security. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2013.12.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
