Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,506

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pretesting survey instruments: An overview of cognitive methods

Collins, Debbie·2003·Quality of Life Research

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1023254226592

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Fowler FJ. ImprovingSurvey Questions: Design and Evaluation. Applied Social Research Methods Series: 38. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1995.
  2. Oksenberg L, Cannell C, Kalton G. New strategies for pretesting survey questions. J Off Stat 1991; 7(3): 349–365.
  3. Cannell CF, Oksenberg L, Converse JM (eds). Experiments in Interviewing Techniques: Field Experiments in Health Reporting, 1971-1977. Survey Research Centre, Institute of Social Research, University of Michigan. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, 1979.
  4. Aborn M. CASM revisited. In: Sirken MG, Herrmann DJ, Schechter S, Schwarz N, Tanur JM, Tourangeau R (eds), Cognition and Survey Research. New York: Wiley, 1999: 21–38.
  5. Tourangeau R. Cognitive sciences and survey methods. In: Jabine T, Straf M, Tanur J, Tourangeau R (eds). Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology: Building a Bridge Between the Disciplines. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1984: 73–100.
  6. Esposito J, Jobe J. A General Model of the Survey Interaction Process. Bureau of the Census Seventh Annual Research Conference Proceedings. Washington DC: US Bureau of the Census, 1991: 537–560.
  7. Schober MF. Making sense of questions: an interactional approach. In: Sirken, MG, Herrmann DJ, Schechter S, Schwarz N, Tanur JM, Tourangeau R (eds), Cognition and Survey Research. New York: Wiley, 1999: 77–93.
  8. Czaja, R. Questionnaire pretesting comes of age. Market Bull 1998; 9: 52–66.
  9. Schwarz N. Questionnaire design: The rocky road from concepts to answers. In: LybergL, Biemer P, Collins M, de Leeuw E, Dippo C, Schwarz N, Trewin D (eds), Survey Measurement and Process Quality. New York: Wiley, 1997: 29–45.
  10. Willis GB. Cognitive Interviewing and Questionnaire Design: A training manual. Hyattsville, MD: National Centre for Health Statistics, 1994.
  11. Willis GB, DeMaio T, Harris-Kojetin B. Is the bandwagon headed to the methodological promised land? Evaluating the validity of cognitive interviewing techniques. In: Sirken MG, Herrmann DJ, Schechter S, Schwarz N, Tanur JM, Tourangeau R (eds), Cognition and Survey Research. New York: Wiley, 1999: 133–153.

Cited by

See all 1,506

Metadata

Authors
Collins, D.
Venue
Quality of Life Research
Published
2003-05
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
229-238
ISSN
  • 0962-9343 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2649
OpenAlex
W2117891525
Cited by
1,506
References
36
FWCI
28.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pretesting survey instruments: An overview of cognitive methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1023/a:1023254226592
The paper
Collins, D. (2003). Pretesting survey instruments: An overview of cognitive methods. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1023254226592

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.