Cited by 48Adversarial Robustness in Machine LearningPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataDigital Media Forensic Detection

Defense against backdoor attack in federated learning

Lu, Shiwei, Li, Ruihu, Liu, Wenbin, Chen, Xuan·2022·Computers & Security

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cose.2022.102819

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lu, S., Li, R., Liu, W., & Chen, X.
Affiliations
  • Air Force Engineering University (CN)
  • Guangzhou University (CN)
Corresponding author
Lu, Shiwei
Venue
Computers & Security
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-10
Volume
121
Pages
102819
ISSN
0167-4048 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283702393
Cited by
48
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 4
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers & Security (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (11801564, 11901579, 2021JM-216, 2021JQ-335, 2022JQ-046, 62072128)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
Keywords
backdoor attacks, federated learning, backdoor detection, similarity measurement, adversarial robustness, privacy preservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review