CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 431Climate change impacts on agricultureAgriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentLand Use and Ecosystem Services

Security risks from climate change and environmental degradation: implications for sustainable land use transformation in the Global South

Open access
Nguyen, Trung Thanh, Grote, Ulrike, Neubacher, Frank, Rahut, Dil B., Do, Manh Hung, Paudel, Gokul P.·2023·Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101322
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Climate change and environmental degradation remain the most complex challenges that present and future generations of humankind face and raise several security risks that have received relatively little attention in the literature. This paper aims to review the evidence of security risks arising from these challenges in the Global South and to provide forward-looking perspectives on how to increase the resilience of affected individuals and communities. We see diverse land use strategies as a key element to drive a transformation towards greater sustainability and resilience. We propose that rural land use in the Global South should be geared towards the promotion of resource and biodiversity conservation, the development of agroforestry, tree-based farming systems, the diversification of crops, and the utilization of climate-resilient cultivars, and neglected and under-utilized plants. These actions would contribute to addressing the security risks stemming from the interconnected challenges of climate change and environmental degradation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101322

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The literature supports an empirical approach that measures how environmental hazards translate into governance strain across different structural contexts.

    “By situating climate security within an institutional throughput framework, the literature supports an empirical approach that measures how environmental hazards translate into governance strain across different structural contexts (Nguyen et al., 2023; Tasnim, 2025; Zaheda, 2025b).”

    From Climate Security, Water Governance, and Resilience How Climate-Induced Water Stress and Migration Challenge State Capacity (2026) · cites this paper as Nguyen et al., 2023

    The Figure 1 discussion (p. 2) links climate-related security risks to limited institutional support, fragility, and political unrest. The “Conflicts and crimes” section (p. 4) also says disasters can temporarily reduce the state’s ability to exercise control. These passages support a connection between environmental hazards and governance strain, but the paper does not propose an empirical approach to measuring that connection across different structural contexts. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. [1]1. PCC, 2022: Summary for Policymakers [H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, E.S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, M. Tignor, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem (eds.)]. In: Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [H.-O. Pörtner, D. C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E.S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem, B. Rama (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, pp. 3-33, doi:10.1017/9781009325844.001. · DOI
  2. [2]2. [·· Feng Y, Zeng Z, Searchinger TD, Ziegler AD, Wu J, Wang D, He X, Elsen PR, Ciais P, Xu R, et al .: Doubling of annual forest carbon loss over the tropics during the early twenty-first century . Nat Sustain 2022, 5 :444-451.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1877-3435(23)00069-6/sbref1) The authors use high resolution satellite data to assess the forest carbon losses and find that gross tropical forest carbon loss has doubled worldwide from 2001 to 2005 to 2015-2019, with most of the loss being associated with large-scale commodity or small-scale agriculture ac­ tivities in Africa and Southeast Asia, highlighting the failure of existing strategies to reduce forest loss and emphasizing the importance of monitoring deforestation trends following the new pledges made in Glasgow.
  3. [3]3. [IPBES: In: Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services . Edited by Brondizio ES, Settele J, Díaz S, Ngo HT. 1148 IPBES Secretariat; 2019.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1877-3435(23)00069-6/sbref2)
  4. [4]4. [WGBU: Rethinking Land in the Anthropocene: From Separation to Integration. German Advisory Council on Global Change; 2020.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1877-3435(23)00069-6/sbref3)
  5. [5]5. [· Uexkull N, von, D ′ Errico M, Jackson J: Drought, resilience, and support for violence: household survey evidence from DR](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1877-3435(23)00069-6/sbref4)
  6. [4]4. [Congo . J Confl Resolut 2020, 64 :1994-2021.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1877-3435(23)00069-6/sbref4) The authros summarize two hypotheses relating to the general support for the use of violence, which is the actual outcome authors investigated in their empirical analysis. First, the more resilient, the less likely an in­ dividual supports the use of violence following agricultural production shocks. Second, the higher the subjective perception of being resilient, the less likely an individual supports the use of violence following agri­ cultural production shocks. The findings show that household resilience plays a key role in understanding the relationship between climate shocks and conflict risks, as less resilient individuals who report ex­ periencing drought and associated losses are more likely to support the use of political violence. This study is based on the novel household survey data from two conflict-affected regions in the Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo.
  7. [6]6. [·· Maertens R: Adverse rainfall shocks and civil war: myth or reality? J Confl Resolut 2021, 65 :701-728.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1877-3435(23)00069-6/sbref5) The author re-examines the relationship between rainfall and civil con­ flict and finds a U-shaped relationship between rainfall and the risk of civil conflict and war in African countries, which is linked to the humpshaped relationship between rainfall and agricultural output during growing seasons.
  8. [7]7. [Hermans K, McLeman R: Climate change, drought, land](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1877-3435(23)00069-6/sbref6)
  9. [2]2. [·· degradation and migration: exploring the linkages . Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2021, 50 :236-244.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1877-3435(23)00069-6/sbref6) The article explores the linkages between climate change, drought, land degradation, and migration, highlighting the complex and multi­ directional relationships between these phenomena. The authors argue that climate change-induced drought and land degradation can con­ tribute to forced migration, but also caution against simplistic narratives that oversimplify the causes and effects of migration.
  10. [8]8. [Koubi V, Nguyen Q, Spilker G, Böhmelt T: Environmental migrants and social-movement participation . J Peace Res 2021, 58 :18-32.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1877-3435(23)00069-6/sbref7)
  11. [9]9. [Bosetti V, Cattaneo C, Peri G: Should they stay or should they go? Climate migrants and local conflicts . J Econ Geogr 2021, 21 :619-651.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1877-3435(23)00069-6/sbref8)
  12. [10]10. [· Vesco P, Dasgupta S, De Cian E, Carraro C: Natural resources and conflict: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature . Ecol Econ 2020, 172 :106633.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1877-3435(23)00069-6/sbref9) The authros undertake a comprehensive meta-analysis of empirical lit­ erature on natural resources and conflict and find that both resource scarcity and abundance are associated with a higher probability of conflict, and the direction and magnitude of the relationship depends on the type of resources and whether climate variables are controlled for, while methodological choices and model specifications greatly influence the probability of finding a significant relationship between conflicts and resources.
  13. [11]11. [·· Scartozzi CM: Reframing climate-induced socio-environmental conflicts: a systematic review . Int Stud Rev 2021, 23 :696-725.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1877-3435(23)00069-6/sbref10) This research presents a systematic review of literature on climate-in­ duced socio-environmental conflicts, arguing for the need to reframe such conflicts to better understand the complex interactions between the environment, society, and power. The review highlights the im­ portance of considering multiple dimensions of conflicts, such as agency, identity, and justice, and suggests that a reframing of these conflicts can inform more effective policy responses.
  14. [12]12. [· Bernauer T, Böhmelt T: International conflict and cooperation over freshwater resources . Nat Sustain 2020, 3 :350-356.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1877-3435(23)00069-6/sbref11) This article provides a comprehensive overview of international conflicts and cooperation over freshwater resources. The authors analyze the factors that contribute to water-related conflicts and the conditions that facilitate international cooperation over water and suggest that effective water governance requires a combination of institutional, technological, and behavioral solutions.
  15. [13]13. [·· Krampe F, Hegazi F, VanDeveer SD: Sustaining peace through better resource governance: three potential mechanisms for environmental peacebuilding . World Dev 2021, 144 :105508.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1877-3435(23)00069-6/sbref12) This article examines the role of natural resource governance in sus­ taining peace and proposes three mechanisms for environmental peacebuilding: conflict prevention, post-conflict peacebuilding, and long-term stability. The authors argue that effective resource govern­ ance can contribute to peacebuilding efforts by addressing the root causes of conflict and promoting cooperation among conflicting parties.
  16. [14]14. [de Coning C: Fitting the pieces together: implications for resilience, adaptive peacebuilding and transitional justice . In Resilience, Adaptive Peacebuilding and Transitional Justice: How Societies Recover after Collective Violence . Edited by Clark JN, Ungar M. Cambridge University Press; 2021:257-275.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1877-3435(23)00069-6/sbref13)
  17. [15]15. ·· Zhu P, Burney J, Chang J, Jin Z, Mueller ND, Xin Q, Xu J, Yu L, Makowski D, Ciais P: Warming reduces global agricultural production by decreasing cropping frequency and yields . Nat Clim Change 2022, 12 :1016-1023, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558022-01492-5. In this article, the authors show that global agricultural production could be severely impacted by warming temperatures, as rising temperatures are predicted to decrease both cropping frequency and yields. The authors also find that reduced cropping frequency is likely to be the most significant factor, and that even moderate warming scenarios could lead to substantial reductions in crop yields. The authors em­ phasize the urgent need for adaptation measures to minimize the im­ pacts of climate change on global food security. · DOI
  18. [17]17. [·· Stoddard I, Anderson K, Capstick S, Carton W, Depledge J, Facer K, Gough C, Hache F, Hoolohan C, Hultman M, et al .: Three](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1877-3435(23)00069-6/sbref16) [Decades of Climate Mitigation: Why Haven't We Bent the Global Emissions Curve? Annu Rev Environ Resour 2021, 46 :653-689.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1877-3435(23)00069-6/sbref16) This is a review article on relationship between climate chagne mitiga­ tion and the global carbon curve. The authors find that the global emissions have not significantly decreased. The authors identify several key factors that have impeded progress, including political barriers, technological and economic challenges, and individual and societal factors. The authors also suggest strategies for accelerating progress in climate mitigation, such as increasing public awareness and engage­ ment, incentivizing technological innovation, and promoting interna­ tional cooperation.
  19. [18]18. [· Barnes ML, Wang P, Cinner JE, Graham NAJ, Guerrero AM, Jasny L, Lau J, Sutcliffe SR, Zamborain-Mason J: Social determinants of adaptive and transformative responses to climate change . Nat Clim Change 2020, 10 :823-828.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1877-3435(23)00069-6/sbref17) This article examines the social determinants of adaptive and transfor­ mative responses to climate change. The authors argue that social factors such as power relations, gender, culture, and historical legacies play a critical role in shaping climate responses, and that efforts to address climate change must be grounded in an understanding of these complex dynamics. The article suggests that climate action should prioritize empowering marginalized communities, promoting social jus­ tice, and incorporating diverse perspectives and knowledge systems.
  20. [20]20. [·· Nguyen TT, Nguyen TT, Do MH, Nguyen DL, Grote U: Shocks, agricultural productivity, and natural resource extraction in rural Southeast Asia . World Dev 2022, 159 :106043.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1877-3435(23)00069-6/sbref19) The article investigates the impact of external shocks on agricultural productivity and natural resource extraction in rural Southeast Asia using a panel dataset from Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia. The authors find that external shocks such as natural disasters and commodity price fluctuations have a significant negative effect on agricultural pro­ ductivity, and that this effect is amplified in areas where natural resource extraction is prevalent. The study suggests that policies aimed at pro­ moting diversification and resilience in rural economies could mitigate the negative impacts of external shocks.
  21. [21]21. [· de Coning C: Adaptive peace operations: navigating the complexity of influencing societal change without causing harm . Int Peace 2020, 27 :836-858.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1877-3435(23)00069-6/sbref20) The article argues that traditional peace operations have not been ef­ fective in addressing the complexity of conflicts in many parts of the world, and that a new approach called "adaptive peace operations" is needed. The author defines adaptive peace operations as a process of continuous learning and adaptation to the context and emphasizes the importance of avoiding unintended negative consequences of inter­ vention. The article concludes that adaptive peace operations require a new mindset, new tools and methods, and a focus on building trust and partnerships with local actors.
  22. [23]23. [Hasegawa T, Sakurai G, Fujimori S, Takahashi K, Hijioka Y, Masui](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1877-3435(23)00069-6/sbref22)
  23. [2]2. [·· T: Extreme climate events increase risk of global food insecurity and adaptation needs . Nat Food 2021, 2 :587-595.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1877-3435(23)00069-6/sbref22) The article analyzes the impact of extreme climate events on global food security and the adaptation needs required to address them. The au­ thors find that extreme weather conditions such as heatwaves, droughts, and floods can significantly reduce crop yields, increasing the risk of food insecurity. The study suggests that climate change adap­ tation strategies should prioritize improving agricultural productivity and increasing the resilience of food systems, while also addressing the social and economic factors that contribute to vulnerability.
  24. [24]24. [Grote U, Fasse A, Nguyen TT, Erenstein O:](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1877-3435(23)00069-6/sbref23)
  25. [2]2. [·· dynamics of wheat and maize value chains in Africa and Asia Front Sustain Food Syst 2021, 4 :1-17.](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1877-3435(23)00069-6/sbref23)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nguyen, T. T., Grote, U., Neubacher, F., Rahut, D. B., Do, M. H., & Paudel, G. P.
Affiliations
  • Leibniz University Hannover (DE)
  • University of Cologne (DE)
  • Asian Development Bank Institute (JP)
ORCID
Venue
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-08
Volume
63
Pages
101322
ISSN
1877-3435 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101322
OpenAlex
W4383163295
Cited by
431
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 138 · 2025: 180 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 18
FWCI
11.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Institutional Repository of Leibniz Universität Hannover (Leibniz Universität Hannover) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Leibniz Universität Hannover (cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Keywords
climate security, environmental degradation, Global South, rural land use, community resilience, biodiversity conservation, agroforestry, crop diversification, climate-resilient cultivars, resource conservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review