Cited by 1,051NF-κB Signaling PathwaysRedox biology and oxidative stressGenomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress

NF-κB in oxidative stress

Open access
Lingappan, Krithika·2018·Current Opinion in Toxicology

Abstract

The transcription factor nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) modulates gene expression in diverse cellular processes such as innate immune response, embryogenesis and organ development, cell proliferation and apoptosis, and stress responses to a variety of noxious stimuli. When cellular production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) overwhelms its antioxidant capacity, it leads to a state of oxidative stress, which in turn contributes to the pathogenesis of several human diseases. Different models of oxidative stress have been studied to elucidate the effects of oxidant stress on NF-κB related activities. ROS can both activate and repress NF-κB signaling in a phase and context dependent manner. The NF-κB pathway can have both anti- and pro-oxidant roles in the setting of oxidative stress. In this review, we focus on role of oxidative stress on different mediators of the NF-κB pathway, and the role of NF-κB activation in the modulation of oxidative stress. A greater understanding of the complex interplay between the NF-κB signaling and oxidative stress may lead to the development of therapeutic strategies for the treatment of a myriad of human diseases for which oxidative stress has an etiologic role.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cotox.2017.11.002

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lingappan, K.
Affiliations
Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Lingappan, Krithika
Venue
Current Opinion in Toxicology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
7
Pages
81-86
ISSN
2468-2020 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2767765728
Cited by
1,051
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 147 · 2025: 231 · 2024: 180 · 2023: 133 · 2022: 139 · 2021: 114 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K08HL127103)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › NF-κB Signaling Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Redox biology and oxidative stress
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress
Keywords
NF-κB signaling, oxidative stress, reactive oxygen species, antioxidant capacity, NF-κB activation, stress response, pathogenesis, treatment options

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review