CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 127

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Corporate environmental responsibility and accountability: What chance in vulnerable Bangladesh?

Belal, Ataur Rahman, Cooper, Stuart M., Khan, Niaz Ahmed·2015·Critical Perspectives on Accounting
DOI 10.1016/j.cpa.2015.01.005
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpa.2015.01.005

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Adger, 2006, Vulnerability, Global Environmental Change, 16, 268, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Archel, 2009, Social disclosure, legitimacy theory and the role of the state, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22, 1284, 10.1108/09513570910999319 · DOI
  3. Bakre, 2008, Financial reporting as technology that supports and sustains imperial expansion, maintenance and control in the colonial and post-colonial globalisation: The case of the Jamaican economy, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 19, 487, 10.1016/j.cpa.2006.09.002 · DOI
  4. Belal, 2010, Corporate environmental and climate change disclosures: Empirical evidence From Bangladesh, Research in Accounting in Emerging Economies, 10, 145, 10.1108/S1479-3563(2010)0000010011 · DOI
  5. Belal, 2010, Stakeholders’ perceptions of corporate social reporting in Bangladesh, Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 311, 10.1007/s10551-010-0511-4 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Belal, 2011, The absence of corporate social responsibility reporting in Bangladesh, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22, 654, 10.1016/j.cpa.2010.06.020 · DOI
  7. Belal, 2013, Vulnerable and exploitable: The need for organisational accountability and transparency in emerging and less developed economies, Accounting Forum, 37, 81, 10.1016/j.accfor.2013.04.001 · DOI
  8. Belal, 1998, Industrial pollution and the environment in Bangladesh: An overview, Asian Journal of Environmental Management, 6, 115
  9. Belal, 2007, The views of corporate managers on the current state of, and future prospects for social reporting in Bangladesh: An engagement based study, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20, 472, 10.1108/09513570710748599 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Berkes, 2007, Understanding uncertainty and reducing vulnerability: Lessons from resilience thinking, Natural Hazards, 41, 283, 10.1007/s11069-006-9036-7 · DOI
  11. Birkmann, 2007, Risk and vulnerability indicators at different scales: Applicability, usefulness and policy implications, Environmental Hazards, 7, 20, 10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.04.002 · DOI
  12. Brouwer, 2007, Socioeconomic vulnerability and adaptation to environmental risk: A case study of climate change and flooding in Bangladesh, Risk Analysis, 27, 313, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00884.x · DOI · Paper page
  13. Brown, 2013, Vulnerability and the basis of business ethics: From fiduciary duties to professionalism, Journal of Business Ethics, 113, 489, 10.1007/s10551-012-1318-2 · DOI
  14. Chwastiak, 2003, Silences in annual reports, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 14, 533, 10.1016/S1045-2354(02)00162-4 · DOI
  15. Cooper, 2007, Corporate social reporting and stakeholder accountability: The missing link, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32, 649, 10.1016/j.aos.2007.02.001 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Derry, 2012, Reclaiming marginalized stakeholders, Journal of Business Ethics, 111, 253, 10.1007/s10551-012-1205-x · DOI
  17. Dominelli, 1996, Globalisation, the privatisation of welfare, and the changing role of professional academics in Britain, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 7, 191, 10.1006/cpac.1996.0024 · DOI
  18. Eden, 2001, Introduction to the symposium: Multinationals: The Janus face of globalization, Journal of International Business Studies, 32, 383, 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490973 · DOI
  19. Eisenhardt, 2002, Has strategy changed?, MIT Sloan Management Review, 43, 88
  20. Fraser, 2003, Mutual vulnerability, mutual dependence: The reflexive relation between human society and the environment, Global Environmental Change, 13, 137, 10.1016/S0959-3780(03)00022-0 · DOI
  21. Füssel, 2007, Vulnerability: A generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research, Global Environmental Change, 17, 155, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.05.002 · DOI
  22. Gallhofer, 2006, The accounting–globalisation interrelation: An overview with some reflections on the neglected dimension of emancipatory potentiality, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 17, 903, 10.1016/j.cpa.2005.08.007 · DOI
  23. Gallhofer, 2011, The accountancy profession and the ambiguities of globalisation in a post-colonial, Middle Eastern and Islamic context: Perceptions of accountants in Syria, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22, 376, 10.1016/j.cpa.2010.09.003 · DOI
  24. Gallhofer, 2011, Accountability and transparency in relation to human rights: A critical perspective reflecting upon accounting, corporate responsibility and ways forward in the context of globalisation, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22, 765, 10.1016/j.cpa.2011.07.002 · DOI
  25. Gallopin, 2006, Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity, Global Environmental Change, 16, 293, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.004 · DOI
  26. Gardner, 2012, Elusive partnerships: Gas extraction and CSR in Bangladesh, Resources Policy, 37, 168, 10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.01.001 · DOI
  27. Gopinath, 2012, A systems framework for globalisation, International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 8, 316, 10.1504/IJBG.2012.046208 · DOI
  28. Guillen, 2001, Is globalization civilizing, destructive or feeble? A critique of five key debates in the social science literature, Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 235, 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.235 · DOI
  29. Hilson, 2012, Corporate social responsibility in the extractive industries: Experiences from developing countries, Resources Policy, 37, 131, 10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.01.002 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Hinkel, 2011, Indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity: Towards a clarification of the science-policy interface, Global Environmental Change, 21, 198, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.08.002 · DOI
  31. Hoque, 2013, Theoretical triangulation and pluralism in research methods in organizational and accounting research, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26, 1170, 10.1108/AAAJ-May-2012-01024 · DOI
  32. Islam, 2008, Motivations for an organisation within a developing country to report social responsibility information: Evidence from Bangladesh, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21, 850, 10.1108/09513570810893272 · DOI
  33. Islam, 2011, Environmental incidents in a developing country and corporate environmental disclosures, Society and Business Review, 6, 229, 10.1108/17465681111170984 · DOI
  34. Jamali, 2010, The CSR of MNC subsidiaries in developing countries: Global, local, substantive or diluted?, Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 181, 10.1007/s10551-010-0560-8 · DOI
  35. Jenkins, 2005, Globalization, corporate social responsibility and poverty, International Affairs, 81, 525, 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2005.00467.x · DOI
  36. Khan, 1999, The politics of the Bangladesh Environmental Protection Act, Environmental Politics, 8, 311, 10.1080/09644019908414449 · DOI
  37. Lévy, 2007, The interface between globalization, trade and development: Theoretical issues for international business studies, International Business Review, 16, 594, 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2007.06.004 · DOI
  38. Matin, 1995, Environmental pollution and its control in Bangladesh, TRAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 14, 468, 10.1016/0165-9936(95)90807-Y · DOI
  39. Momin, 2013, Social and environmental NGOs’ perceptions of corporate social disclosures: The case of Bangladesh, Accounting Forum, 37, 150, 10.1016/j.accfor.2013.04.005 · DOI
  40. Montalbano, 2011, Trade openness and developing countries’ vulnerability: Concepts, misconceptions, and directions for research, World Development, 39, 1489, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.02.009 · DOI
  41. Morgan, 1980, The case for qualitative research, Academy of Management Review, 5, 491, 10.5465/amr.1980.4288947 · DOI
  42. O’Brien, 2007, Why different interpretations of vulnerability matter in climate change discourses, Climate Policy, 7, 73, 10.1080/14693062.2007.9685639 · DOI
  43. Poullaos, 2004, Globalisation, accounting critique and the university, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15, 715, 10.1016/S1045-2354(03)00057-1 · DOI
  44. Quattrone, 2006, The possibility of the testimony: A case for case study research, Organization, 13, 143, 10.1177/1350508406059647 · DOI
  45. Roberts, 2003, The manufacture of corporate social responsibility: Constructing corporate sensibility, Organization, 10, 249, 10.1177/1350508403010002004 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Rubenstein, 2007, Accountability in an unequal world, Journal of Politics, 69, 616, 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00563.x · DOI
  47. Smit, 2006, Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability, Global Environmental Change, 16, 282, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.008 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Tschakert, 2007, Views from the vulnerable: Understanding climatic and other stressors in the Sahel, Global Environmental Change, 17, 381, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.11.008 · DOI
  49. Turner, 2010, Vulnerability and resilience: Coalescing or paralleling approaches for sustainability science?, Global Environmental Change, 20, 570, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.003 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 127

Metadata

Authors
Belal, A. R., Cooper, S. M., & Khan, N. A.
ORCID
Belal, Ataur Rahman
Venue
Critical Perspectives on Accounting
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
33
Pages
44-58
ISSN
1045-2354
DOI
10.1016/j.cpa.2015.01.005
Cited by
127
References
0
Language
en
Licence
Funders
British Council

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Corporate environmental responsibility and accountability: What chance in vulnerable Bangladesh? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cpa.2015.01.005
The paper
Belal, A. R., Cooper, S. M., & Khan, N. A. (2015). Corporate environmental responsibility and accountability: What chance in vulnerable Bangladesh? Critical Perspectives on Accounting. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2015.01.005