Cited by 212

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lineage-specific rediploidization is a mechanism to explain time-lags between genome duplication and evolutionary diversification

Robertson, Fiona M., Gundappa, Manu Kumar, Grammes, Fabian, Hvidsten, Torgeir R., Redmond, Anthony K., Lien, Sigbjørn, Martin, Samuel A. M., Holland, Peter W. H., Sandve, Simen R., Macqueen, Daniel J.·2017·Genome Biology

Published version of a preprint

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13059-017-1241-z

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Maintenance of tetraploidy for millions of years over entire homeologs has been previously shown following autotetraploidization events in salmonids and Acipenseriformes.

    “Maintenance of tetraploidy for millions of years over entire homeologs has been previously shown following autotetraploidization events in salmonids and Acipenseriformes (Robertson et al. 2017; Gundappa et al. 2022; Redmond et al. 2022).”
  • Rediploidization was not uniform across the ancestral teleost genome.

    “This snapshot of the rediploidization status at the time of the Osteoglossiformes/Clupeocephala lineage split shows that rediploidization was not uniform across the ancestral teleost genome, consistent with results in salmonids (Robertson et al. 2017; Gundappa et al. 2022).”
  • "a" and "b" gene assignments are not informative of the underlying sequence information contained in genomic regions that showed delayed rediploidization.

    “As such, “a” and “b” gene assignments are not informative of the underlying sequence information contained in genomic regions that showed delayed rediploidization, and these genes should be considered as tetralogs rather than paralogs and orthologs (Martin and Holland 2014; Robertson et al. 2017).”
  • Genes in genomic regions that showed delayed rediploidization should be considered as tetralogs rather than paralogs and orthologs.

    “As such, “a” and “b” gene assignments are not informative of the underlying sequence information contained in genomic regions that showed delayed rediploidization, and these genes should be considered as tetralogs rather than paralogs and orthologs (Martin and Holland 2014; Robertson et al. 2017).”
  • The genetic and functional divergence of these genes has occurred independently in each subsequent lineage.

    “The genetic and functional divergence of these genes has occurred independently in each subsequent lineage, and further inquiry will reveal whether these specific evolutionary dynamics have contributed to lineage-specific evolution in the major teleost clades, as described in salmonids (Robertson et al. 2017; Gundappa et al. 2022).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 71

  1. Albertin W, Marullo P. Polyploidy in fungi: evolution after whole-genome duplication. Proc Biol Sci. 2012;279:2497–50. · DOI
  2. Glasauer SM, Neuhauss SC. Whole-genome duplication in teleost fishes and its evolutionary consequences. Mol Genet Genomics. 2014;289:1045–60. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Soltis PS, Marchant DB, Van de Peer Y, Soltis DE. Polyploidy and genome evolution in plants. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2015;35:119–25. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Comai L. The advantages and disadvantages of being polyploid. Nat Rev Genet. 2005;6:836–46. · DOI
  5. Innan H, Kondrashov F. The evolution of gene duplications: classifying and distinguishing between models. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:97–108. · DOI
  6. Freeling M, Thomas BC. Gene-balanced duplications, like tetraploidy, provide predictable drive to increase morphological complexity. Genome Res. 2006;16:805–14. · DOI
  7. Huminiecki L, Heldin CH. 2R and remodeling of vertebrate signal transduction engine. BMC Biol. 2010;8:146. · DOI
  8. Jiao Y, Wickett NJ, Ayyampalayam S, Chanderbali AS, Landherr L, Ralph PE, Tomsho LP, Hu Y. Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms. Nature. 2011;473:97–100. · DOI
  9. Ohno S. Evolution by gene duplication. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1970. See: https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/gb-2006-7-5-r43 . · DOI
  10. Holland PW, Garcia-Fernandez J, Williams NA, Sidow A. Gene duplications and the origins of vertebrate development. Dev Suppl. 1994;125-33. See: https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/gb-2006-7-5-r43. · DOI
  11. Sidow A. Gen(om)e duplications in the evolution of early vertebrates. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1996;6:715–22. · DOI
  12. Aburomia R, Khaner O, Sidow A. Functional evolution in the ancestral lineage of vertebrates or when genomic complexity was wagging its morphological tail. J Struct Funct Genomics. 2003;3:45–52. · DOI
  13. Blomme T, Vandepoele K, De Bodt S, Simillion C, Maere S, Van de Peer Y. The gain and loss of genes during 600 million years of vertebrate evolution. Genome Biol. 2006;7:R43. · DOI
  14. Wittbrodt J, Meyer A, Schartl M. More genes in fish? BioEssays. 1998;20:511–5. · DOI
  15. Hoegg S, Brinkmann H, Taylor JS, Meyer A. Phylogenetic timing of the fish-specific genome duplication correlates with the diversification of teleost fish. J Mol Evol. 2004;59:190–203. · DOI
  16. Meyer A, Van de Peer Y. From 2R to 3R: evidence for a fish-specific genome duplication (FSGD). Bioessays. 2005;27:937–45. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Crow KD, Stadler PF, Lynch VJ, Amemiya C, Wagner GP. The “fish-specific” Hox cluster duplication is coincident with the origin of teleosts. Mol Biol Evol. 2006;23:121–36. · DOI
  18. De Bodt S, Maere S, Van de Peer Y. Genome duplication and the origin of angiosperms. Trends Ecol Evol. 2005;20:591–7. · DOI
  19. Soltis DE, Albert VA, Leebens-Mack J, Bell CD, Paterson AH, Zheng C, Sankoff D, Depamphilis CW, et al. Polyploidy and angiosperm diversification. Am J Bot. 2009;96:336–48. · DOI
  20. Soltis PS, Soltis DE. Ancient WGD events as drivers of key innovations in angiosperms. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2016;30:159–65. · DOI
  21. Nossa CW, Havlak P, Yue JX, Lv J, Vincent KY, Brockmann HJ, Putnam NH. Joint assembly and genetic mapping of the Atlantic horseshoe crab genome reveals ancient whole genome duplication. Gigascience. 2014;3:9. · DOI
  22. Crow KD, Smith CD, Cheng JF, Wagner GP, Amemiya CT. An independent genome duplication inferred from Hox paralogs in the American paddlefish--a representative basal ray-finned fish and important comparative reference. Genome Biol Evol. 2012;4:937–53. · DOI
  23. Aury JM, Jaillon O, Duret L, Noel B, Jubin C, Porcel BM, Ségurens B, Daubin V, et al. Global trends of whole-genome duplications revealed by the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia. Nature. 2006;444:171–8. · DOI
  24. Donoghue PC, Purnell MA. Genome duplication, extinction and vertebrate evolution. Trends Ecol Evol. 2005;20:312–9. · DOI
  25. Clarke JT, Lloyd GT, Friedman M. Little evidence for enhanced phenotypic evolution in early teleosts relative to their living fossil sister group. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:11531–6. · DOI
  26. Santini F, Harmon LJ, Carnevale G, Alfaro ME. Did genome duplication drive the origin of teleosts? A comparative study of diversification in ray-finned fishes BMC Evol Biol. 2009;9:194.
  27. Alfaro ME, Santini F, Brock C, Alamillo H, Dornburg A, Rabosky DL, Carnevale G, Harmon LJ. Nine exceptional radiations plus high turnover explain species diversity in jawed vertebrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:13410–4. · DOI
  28. Schranz ME, Mohammadin S, Edger PP. Ancient whole genome duplications, novelty and diversification: the WGD Radiation Lag-Time Model. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2012;15:147–53. · DOI
  29. Tank DC, Eastman JM, Pennell MW, Soltis PS, Soltis DE, Hinchliff CE, Brown JW, Sessa EB, Harmon LJ. Nested radiations and the pulse of angiosperm diversification: increased diversification rates often follow whole genome duplications. New Phytol. 2015;207:454–67. · DOI
  30. Macqueen DJ, Johnston IA. A well-constrained estimate for the timing of the salmonid whole genome duplication reveals major decoupling from species diversification. Proc Biol Sci. 2014;281:20132881. · DOI
  31. Björnsson BT, Stefansson SO, McCormick SD. Environmental endocrinology of salmon smoltification. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2011;170:290–8. · DOI
  32. Wolfe KH. Yesterday’s polyploids and the mystery of diploidization. Nat Rev Genet. 2001;2:333–41. · DOI
  33. Furlong RF, Holland PW. Were vertebrates octoploid? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002;357:531–4. · DOI
  34. Allendorf FW, Thorgaard GH. Tetraploidy and the evolution of salmonid fishes. In: Turner BJ, editor. Evolutionary genetics of fishes. New York: Plenum Press; 1984. p. 1–53. · DOI
  35. Lien S, Koop BF, Sandve SR, Miller JR, Kent MP, Nome T, Hvidsten TR, Leong JS, et al. The Atlantic salmon genome provides insights into rediploidization. Nature. 2016;533:200–5. · DOI
  36. Allendorf FW, Bassham S, Cresko WA, Limborg MT, Seeb LW, Seeb JE. Effects of crossovers between homeologs on inheritance and population genomics in polyploid-derived salmonid fishes. J Hered. 2015;106:217–27. · DOI
  37. Waples RK, Seeb LW, Seeb JE. Linkage mapping with paralogs exposes regions of residual tetrasomic inheritance in chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta). Mol Ecol Resour. 2016;16:17–28. · DOI
  38. Campbell MA, López JA, Sado T, Miya M. Pike and salmon as sister taxa: detailed intraclade resolution and divergence time estimation of Esociformes + Salmoniformes based on whole mitochondrial genome sequences. Gene. 2013;530:57–65. · DOI
  39. Alexandrou MA, Swartz BA, Matzke NJ, Oakley TH. Genome duplication and multiple evolutionary origins of complex migratory behavior in Salmonidae. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2013;69:514–23. · DOI
  40. Martin KJ, Holland PW. Enigmatic orthology relationships between Hox clusters of the African butterfly fish and other teleosts following ancient whole-genome duplication. Mol Biol Evol. 2014;31:2592–611. · DOI · Paper page
  41. Van de Peer Y. Computational approaches to unveiling ancient genome duplications. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5:752–63. · DOI
  42. Berthelot C, Brunet F, Chalopin D, Juanchich A, Bernard M, Noël B, Bento P, Da Silva C, et al. The rainbow trout genome provides novel insights into evolution after whole-genome duplication in vertebrates. Nat Commun. 2014;22(5):3657. · DOI
  43. Lappin FL, Shaw RL, Macqueen DJ. Targeted sequencing for high-resolution evolutionary analyses following recent genome duplication: proof of concept for key components of the salmonid insulin-like growth factor axis. Mar Genomics. 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.margen.2016.06.003 . · DOI
  44. Rondeau EB, Minkley DR, Leong JS, Messmer AM, Jantzen JR, von Schalburg KR, Lemon C, Bird NH, et al. The genome and linkage map of the northern pike (Esox lucius): conserved synteny revealed between the salmonid sister group and the Neoteleostei. PLoS One. 2014;9:e102089. · DOI
  45. Amores A, Force A, Yan YL, Joly L, Amemiya C, Fritz A, Ho RK, Langeland J, et al. Zebrafish hox clusters and vertebrate genome evolution. Science. 1998;282:1711–4. · DOI
  46. Mungpakdee S, Seo HC, Angotzi AR, Dong X, Akalin A, Chourrout D. Differential evolution of the 13 Atlantic salmon Hox clusters. Mol Biol Evol. 2008;25:1333–43. · DOI
  47. Ma B, Jiang H, Sun P, Chen J, Li L, Zhang X, Yuan L. Phylogeny and dating of divergences within the genus Thymallus (Salmonidae: Thymallinae) using complete mitochondrial genomes. Mitochondrial DNA A DNA MappSeq Anal. 2015;27:3602–11. · DOI
  48. Stefansson SO, Björnsson BT. Ebbesson, LOE, McCormick SD. Smoltification. In: Finn N, Kappor BG, editors. Fish larval physiology. Florida: CRC Press; 2008. p. 639–681. · DOI
  49. Harada M, Yoshinaga T, Ojima D, Iwata M. cDNA cloning and expression analysis of thyroid hormone receptor in the coho salmon Oncorhynchus kisutch during smoltification. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2008;155:658–67. · DOI
  50. Kiilerich P, Kristiansen K, Madsen SS. Hormone receptors in gills of smolting Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar: expression of growth hormone, prolactin, mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid receptors and 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2007;152:295–303. · DOI
  51. Seidelin M, Madsen SS, Byrialsen A, Kristiansen K. Effects of insulin-like growth factor-I and cortisol on Na+, K+-ATPase expression in osmoregulatory tissues of brown trout (Salmo trutta). Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1999;113:331–42. · DOI
  52. Seidelin M, Madsen SS. Endocrine control of Na+, K+-ATPase and chloride cell development in brown trout (Salmo trutta): interaction of insulin-like growth factor-I with prolactin and growth hormone. J Endocrinol. 1999;162:127–35. · DOI
  53. Balsa JA, Sánchez-Franco F, Pazos F, Lara JI, Lorenzo MJ, Maldonado G, Cacicedo L. Direct action of serotonin on prolactin, growth hormone, corticotropin and luteinizing hormone release in cocultures of anterior and posterior pituitary lobes: autocrine and/or paracrine action of vasoactive intestinal peptide. Neuroendocrinology. 1998;68:326–33. · DOI
  54. Hakes L, Pinney JW, Lovell SC, Oliver SG, Robertson DL. All duplicates are not equal: the difference between small-scale and genome duplication. Genome Biol. 2007;8:R209. · DOI
  55. Carretero-Paulet L, Fares MA. Evolutionary dynamics and functional specialization of plant paralogs formed by whole and small-scale genome duplications. Mol Biol Evol. 2012;29:3541–51. · DOI
  56. Ramsey J, Schemske DW. Neopolyploidy in flowering plants. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2002;33:589–639. · DOI
  57. Smith JJ, Keinath MC. The sea lamprey meiotic map improves resolution of ancient vertebrate genome duplications. Genome Res. 2015;25:1081–90. · DOI · Paper page
  58. De Storme N, Mason A. Plant speciation through chromosome instability and ploidy change: Cellular mechanisms, molecular factors and evolutionary relevance. Curr Plant Biol. 2014;1:10–33. · DOI
  59. Mehta TK, Ravi V, Yamasaki S, Lee AP, Lian MM, Tay BH, Tohari S, Yanai S, Tay A, Brenner S, Venkatesh B. Evidence for at least six Hox clusters in the Japanese lamprey (Lethenteron japonicum). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:16044–9. · DOI
  60. Smith JJ, Kuraku S, Holt C, Sauka-Spengler T, Jiang N, Campbell MS, Yandell MD, Manousaki T, et al. Sequencing of the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) genome provides insights into vertebrate evolution. Nat Genet. 2013;45:415–21. · DOI
  61. Macqueen DJ, Primmer CR, Houston RD, Nowak BF, Bernatchez L, Bergseth S, Davidson WS, Gallardo-Escarate C, et al. Functional Analysis of All Salmonid Genomes (FAASG): an international initiative supporting future salmonid research, conservation and aquaculture. bioRxiv. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1101/095737 . · DOI
  62. Luo R, Liu B, Xie Y, Li Z, Huang W, Yuan J, He G, Chen Y, et al. SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. Gigascience. 2012;1:18. · DOI
  63. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–10. · DOI · Paper page
  64. Drummond AJ, Suchard MA, Xie D, Rambaut A. Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol Biol Evol. 2012;29:1969–73. · DOI
  65. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:2725–9. · DOI
  66. Lanfear R, Calcott B, Ho SY, Guindon S. Partitionfinder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Mol Biol Evol. 2012;29:1695–701. · DOI · Paper page
  67. Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, Batut P, Chaisson M, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2012;29:15–21. · DOI · Paper page
  68. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:139–40. · DOI · Paper page
  69. Gu Z, Gu L, Eils R, Schlesner M, Brors B. circlize implements and enhances circular visualization in R. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2811–2. · DOI
  70. Conesa A, Götz S, García-Gómez JM, Terol J, Talón M, Robles M. Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:3674–6. · DOI
  71. Alexa A, Rahnenführer J, Lengauer T. Improved scoring of functional groups from gene expression data by decorrelating GO graph structure. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:1600–7. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Robertson, F. M., Gundappa, M. K., Grammes, F., Hvidsten, T. R., Redmond, A. K., Lien, S., Martin, S. A. M., Holland, P. W. H., Sandve, S. R., & Macqueen, D. J.
Venue
Genome Biology
Published
2017-06-14
Volume
18
Issue
1
ISSN
1474-760X
Cited by
212
References
10
Language
en
Funders
  • Natural Environment Research Council (NBAF704)
  • Natural Environment Research Council (GB) (NE/L50175X/1)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review