Cited by 199Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Do all psychological treatments really work the same in posttraumatic stress disorder?

Open access
Ehlers, Anke, Bisson, Jonathan, Clark, David M., Creamer, Mark, Pilling, Steven, Richards, David, Schnurr, Paula P., Turner, Stuart +1 more·2010·Clinical Psychology Review

Abstract

A recent meta-analysis by Benish, Imel, and Wampold (2008, Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 746-758) concluded that all bona fide treatments are equally effective in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In contrast, seven other meta-analyses or systematic reviews concluded that there is good evidence that trauma-focused psychological treatments (trauma-focused cognitive behavior therapy and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing) are effective in PTSD; but that treatments that do not focus on the patients' trauma memories or their meanings are either less effective or not yet sufficiently studied. International treatment guidelines therefore recommend trauma-focused psychological treatments as first-line treatments for PTSD. We examine possible reasons for the discrepant conclusions and argue that (1) the selection procedure of the available evidence used in Benish et al.'s (2008)meta-analysis introduces bias, and (2) the analysis and conclusions fail to take into account the need to demonstrate that treatments for PTSD are more effective than natural recovery. Furthermore, significant increases in effect sizes of trauma-focused cognitive behavior therapies over the past two decades contradict the conclusion that content of treatment does not matter. To advance understanding of the optimal treatment for PTSD, we recommend further research into the active mechanisms of therapeutic change, including treatment elements commonly considered to be non-specific. We also recommend transparency in reporting exclusions in meta-analyses and suggest that bona fide treatments should be defined on empirical and theoretical grounds rather than by judgments of the investigators' intent.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.12.001

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Acupuncture may function by downregulating brain systems involved in activating the HPA axis and the sympathetic arm of the autonomic system.

    “Studies suggest that acupuncture may function by downregulating brain systems involved in activating the HPA axis and the sympathetic arm of the autonomic system.152–154”

    From Fear and the Defense Cascade (2015) · cites this paper as [153]

    The ‘Treatment mechanisms’ and ‘Criteria for active treatments’ sections discuss psychological treatments for PTSD, but do not address acupuncture or its effects on the HPA axis or sympathetic nervous system. Searches of our copy for acupuncture and those proposed mechanisms found no supporting passage; page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. American Psychiatric Association (2004). Treatment of patients with acute stress disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder. http://www.psychiatryonline.com/pracGuide/pracGuideTopic_11.aspx. 15617511
  2. Bisson J. Ehlers A. Matthews R. Pilling S. Richards D. Turner S. Systematic review and metaanalysis of psychological treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder British Journal of Psychiatry 190 2007 97 104 17267924
  3. Carlson J.G. Chemtob C.M. Resnka K. Hedlund N.L. Muraoka M.Y. Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder Journal of Traumatic Stress 11 1998 3 24 9479673
  4. Committee on Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Institute of Medicine of the National Academies Treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder: Assessment of the evidence 2008 National Academies Press Washington, D.C
  5. Tarrier N. Pilgrim H. Sommerfield C. Faragher B. Reynolds M. Graham E. Cognitive and exposure therapy in the treatment of PTSD Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 67 1999 13 18 10028204
  6. Wampold, B. E. (2008). So it's good outcomes from me. And it's good outcomes from him. Is it the treatment or the therapist that works? Closing debate. Paper presented at the Savoy Conference on Psychological Therapies in the NHS, Science, Practice and Policy, London, 27th November 2008. http://www.newsavoypartnership.org/2008conference.htm

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ehlers, A., Bisson, J., Clark, D. M., Creamer, M., Pilling, S., Richards, D., Schnurr, P. P., Turner, S., & Yule, W.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
Corresponding author
Ehlers, Anke
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-03
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
269-276
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2101542507
Cited by
199
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 11
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust Principal Research Fellowship (069777)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy, EMDR, treatment content, meta-analysis bias, natural recovery, non-specific treatment effects, therapeutic mechanisms, treatment guidelines
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Life Change Events, Psychotherapy, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Selection Bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review