CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 291Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCrime Patterns and InterventionsCriminal Justice and Penology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 159 of the 162 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The impact of incarceration on juvenile offenders

Lambie, Ian, Randell, Isabel·2013·Clinical Psychology Review
DOI 10.1016/j.cpr.2013.01.007
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Increasingly, research points to the negative effects of incarcerating youth offenders, particularly in adult facilities. Literature published since 2000 suggests that incarceration fails to meet the developmental and criminogenic needs of youth offenders and is limited in its ability to provide appropriate rehabilitation. Incarceration often results in negative behavioral and mental health consequences, including ongoing engagement in offending behaviors and contact with the justice system. Although incarceration of youth offenders is often viewed as a necessary means of public protection, research indicates that it is not an effective option in terms of either cost or outcome. The severe behavioral problems of juvenile offenders are a result of complex and interactive individual and environmental factors, which elicit and maintain offending behavior. Therefore, the focus of effective treatment must be on addressing such criminogenic needs and the multiple "systems" in which the young person comes from. Recent research demonstrates that in order to achieve the best outcomes for youth offenders and the general public, community-based, empirically supported intervention practices must be adopted as an alternative to incarceration wherever possible.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2013.01.007

Cites

159 of 159 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Braverman, 2011, Health care for youth in the juvenile justice system, Pediatrics, 128, 1219, 10.1542/peds.2011-1757 · DOI
  2. Dowden, 1999, What works in young offender treatment: A meta-analysis, Forum on Corrections Research, 11, 21
  3. Henggeler, 2011, Social policy report: Evidence-based interventions for juvenile offenders and juvenile justice policies that support them, Sharing Child and Youth Development Knowledge, 25, 1
  4. Little, M. (2006) A social development model of incarceration on juvenile offenders' social network support, exposure to antisocial peers, aggressive offending and psychological adjustment. (Doctoral Dissertation). Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
  5. Workman, 2011, Walking into the future backwards: Reflections on youth institutionalisation, Rethinking Crime and Punishment, 85, 2

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 291

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Lambie, I., & Randell, I.
Affiliations
University of Auckland (NZ)
Corresponding author
Lambie, Ian
ORCID
Lambie, Ian
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
448-459
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.cpr.2013.01.007
OpenAlex
W2171613132
Cited by
291
References
162
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
6.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
Keywords
juvenile offenders, incarceration, juvenile detention, criminogenic needs, recidivism, mental health outcomes, behavioral problems, rehabilitation, community-based intervention, alternatives to imprisonment, public protection, cost-effectiveness
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Humans, Juvenile Delinquency, Prisoners, Young Adult, Criminals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review