Cited by 34Schizophrenia research and treatmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health and Psychiatry

Paranoia and negative schema about the self and others: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Humphrey, Charlotte, Bucci, Sandra, Varese, Filippo, Degnan, Amy, Berry, Katherine·2021·Clinical Psychology Review

Abstract

Negative self and negative other schema have been implicated in the development of paranoia. The current study provides a meta-analysis, narrative review and quality appraisal of quantitative studies investigating the relationship between negative self and negative other schema and paranoia across the paranoia continuum. A systematic search identified 43 eligible studies; 25 were included in the meta-analysis. Meta-analytic findings demonstrated a medium to large relationship between paranoia and negative self-schema (r = 0.46, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.53) and negative other schema (r = 0.48, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.56). The magnitude of associations was similar across people with and without psychosis. Findings demonstrated that associations between negative self-schema and paranoia were not always statistically significant when controlling for confounding variables, particularly depression. The association between negative other schema and paranoia tended to remain significant when controlling for confounding variables. Findings also demonstrated that negative schema may mediate relationships between adverse experiences in childhood and paranoia. Overall, findings support theoretical proposals that both negative self and negative other schema are associated with paranoia. Longitudinal studies are required to confirm the direction of effects. Findings provide support for incorporating and targeting negative self and negative other schema in psychological formulations and therapeutic work.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102081

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The person may feel inherently vulnerable in regards to other people due to negative self-beliefs.

    “We then broaden out into a discussion of how the person may feel inherently vulnerable in regards to other people due to negative self-beliefs (Collett, Pugh, Waite, & Freeman, 2016; Humphrey et al., 2021; Waite et al., 2023).”

    From A counterweight model for understanding and treating persecutory delusions. (2025) · cites this paper as Humphrey et al., 2021

    The available passage is the paper’s title and author information, not a finding about feeling vulnerable around others. Searches for vulnerability, negative self-beliefs, and related phrasing found no passage in our copy addressing the claimed link; no page-numbered substantive passage was available. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Humphrey, C., Bucci, S., Varese, F., Degnan, A., & Berry, K.
Affiliations
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
Corresponding author
Berry, Katherine
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
90
Pages
102081
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3197457856
Cited by
34
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
paranoia, negative self-schemas, psychosis, depression, childhood adversity, schema therapy, psychological formulation
MeSH terms
Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Paranoid Disorders, Psychotic Disorders, Self Concept

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review