Neurobiological correlates of resilience during childhood and adolescence – A systematic review
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Research examining the neurobiological mechanisms of resilience has grown rapidly over the past decade. However, there is vast heterogeneity in research study design, methods, and in how resilience is operationalized, making it difficult to gauge what we currently know about resilience biomarkers. This preregistered systematic review aimed to review and synthesize the extant literature to identify neurobiological correlates of resilience to adversity during childhood and adolescence. Literature searches on MEDLINE and PsycINFO yielded 3834 studies and a total of 49 studies were included in the final review. Findings were synthesized based on how resilience was conceptualized (e.g., absence of psychopathology, trait resilience), and where relevant, the type of outcome examined (e.g., internalizing symptoms, post-traumatic stress disorder). Our synthesis showed that findings were generally mixed. Nevertheless, some consistent findings suggest that resilience neural mechanisms may involve prefrontal and subcortical regions structure/activity, as well as connectivity between these regions. Given substantial heterogeneity in the definition and operationalization of resilience, more methodological consistency across studies is required for advancing knowledge in this field.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n71 · Cited by 108,283 · see citing works
Felitti, V. J., Anda, R. F., Nordenberg, D., Williamson, D. F., Spitz, A. M., Edwards, V., Koss, M. P., & Marks, J. S. (1998) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00017-8 · Cited by 18,943 · see citing works
The brief resilience scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back
Smith, B. W., Dalen, J., Wiggins, K., Tooley, E., Christopher, P., & Bernard, J. (2008) · International Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1080/10705500802222972 · Cited by 6,439 · see citing works
Sawyer, S. M., Azzopardi, P. S., Wickremarathne, D., & Patton, G. C. (2018) · The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/s2352-4642(18)30022-1 · Cited by 3,666 · see citing works
Childhood adversities and adult psychopathology in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys
Kessler, R. C., McLaughlin, K. A., Green, J. G., Gruber, M. J., Sampson, N. A., Zaslavsky, A. M., Aguilar-Gaxiola, S., Alhamzawi, A. O., Alonso, J., Angermeyer, M., et al. (2010) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.110.080499 · Cited by 2,640 · see citing works
Adolescence as a sensitive period of brain development
Fuhrmann, D., Knoll, L. J., & Blakemore, S.-J. (2015) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.008 · Cited by 1,158 · see citing works
Galatzer-Levy, I. R., Huang, S. H., & Bonanno, G. A. (2018) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2018.05.008 · Cited by 878 · see citing works
Biological embedding of childhood adversity: from physiological mechanisms to clinical implications
Berens, A. E., Jensen, S. K. G., & Nelson, C. A. (2017) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-017-0895-4 · Cited by 657 · see citing works
Future Directions in Childhood Adversity and Youth Psychopathology
McLaughlin, K. A. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2015.1110823 · Cited by 576 · see citing works
O'Doherty, D. C. M., Chitty, K. M., Saddiqui, S., Bennett, M. R., & Lagopoulos, J. (2015) · Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2015.01.002 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
The Impact of Childhood Maltreatment: A Review of Neurobiological and Genetic Factors
McCrory, E., De Brito, S. A., & Viding, E. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2011.00048 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
The impact of developmental timing for stress and recovery
Gee, D. G., & Casey, B. J. (2015) · Neurobiology of Stress · doi:10.1016/j.ynstr.2015.02.001 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Morey, R. A., Haswell, C. C., Hooper, S. R., & De Bellis, M. D. (2016) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2015.205 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Cassiers, L. L. M., Sabbe, B. G. C., Schmaal, L., Veltman, D. J., Penninx, B. W. J. H., & Van Den Eede, F. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00329 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Walsh, W. A., Dawson, J., & Mattingly, M. J. (2010) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838009358892 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Yang, P., Wu, M.-T., Hsu, C.-C., & Ker, J.-H. (2004) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2004.07.033 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Protective Prevention Effects on the Association of Poverty With Brain Development
Brody, G. H., Gray, J. C., Yu, T., Barton, A. W., Beach, S. R. H., Galván, A., MacKillop, J., Windle, M., Chen, E., Miller, G. E., et al. (2017) · JAMA Pediatrics · doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.2988 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Ventral striatum reactivity to reward and recent life stress interact to predict positive affect
Nikolova, Y. S., Bogdan, R., Brigidi, B. D., & Hariri, A. R. (2012) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.03.014 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Neurobehavioral markers of resilience to depression amongst adolescents exposed to child abuse
Dennison, M. J., Sheridan, M. A., Busso, D. S., Jenness, J. L., Peverill, M., Rosen, M. L., & McLaughlin, K. A. (2016) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/abn0000215 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wolke, D., Zhou, Y., Liu, Y., Eves, R., Mendonça, M., & Twilhaar, E. S. (2025) · Nature Mental Health · doi:10.1038/s44220-025-00479-3 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhang, L., Rakesh, D., Cropley, V., & Whittle, S.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, Lu
- Venue
- Clinical Psychology Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-11
- Volume
- 105
- Pages
- 102333
- ISSN
- 0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4386579977
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 1.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion)
- PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Keywords
- resilience, neurobiological correlates, childhood adversity, adolescence, prefrontal cortex, subcortical structures, neuronal connectivity, internalizing problems, post-traumatic stress disorder, trait resilience, psychopathology
- MeSH terms
- Adverse Childhood Experiences, Adolescent, Brain, Child, Humans, Resilience, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review