Cited by 117Child Abuse and TraumaChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Neurobehavioral markers of resilience to depression amongst adolescents exposed to child abuse

Open access
Dennison, Meg J., Sheridan, Margaret A., Busso, Daniel S., Jenness, Jessica L., Peverill, Matthew, Rosen, Maya L., McLaughlin, Katie A.·2016·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

Childhood maltreatment is strongly associated with depression, which is characterized by reduced reactivity to reward. Identifying factors that mitigate risk for depression in maltreated children is important for understanding etiological links between maltreatment and depression as well as improving early intervention and prevention. We examine whether high reward reactivity at behavioral and neurobiological levels is a marker of resilience to depressive symptomology in adolescence following childhood maltreatment. A sample of 59 adolescents (21 with a history of maltreatment; Mean Age = 16.95 years, SD = 1.44) completed an fMRI task involving passive viewing of emotional stimuli. BOLD signal changes to positive relative to neutral images were extracted in basal ganglia regions of interest. Participants also completed a behavioral reward-processing task outside the scanner. Depression symptoms were assessed at the time of the MRI and again 2 years later. Greater reward reactivity across behavioral and neurobiological measures moderated the association of maltreatment with baseline depression. Specifically, faster reaction time (RT) to cues paired with monetary reward relative to those unpaired with reward and greater BOLD signal in the left pallidum was associated with lower depression symptoms in maltreated youth. Longitudinally, greater BOLD signal in the left putamen moderated change in depression scores over time, such that higher levels of reward response were associated with lower increases in depression over time among maltreated youths. Reactivity to monetary reward and positive social images, at both behavioral and neurobiological levels, is a potential marker of resilience to depression among adolescents exposed to maltreatment. These findings add to a growing body of work highlighting individual differences in reactivity to reward as a core neurodevelopmental mechanism in the etiology of depression. (PsycINFO Database Record

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/abn0000215

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In both groups, lower ventral striatum activation was tied to more depressive symptoms.

    “Despite this difference, in both groups decreased activation of the ventral striatum correlated with increased depressive symptoms.”

    From The effects of early life stress on reward processing (2018) · cites this paper as Dennison et al., 2016

  • Findings on positive emotional stimuli diverge: institutionalized children show lower ventral striatal response to positive faces, whereas abused adolescents show greater reactivity to positive social cues.

    “While institutionally reared children had decreased ventral striatal response to positive emotional faces (Goff et al., 2013), adolescents with a history of physical and sexual abuse demonstrated increased reactivity to positively valenced social stimuli (Dennison et al., 2016), suggesting a potential difference in the effects of neglect vs abuse.”

    From The effects of early life stress on reward processing (2018) · cites this paper as Dennison et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dennison, M. J., Sheridan, M. A., Busso, D. S., Jenness, J. L., Peverill, M., Rosen, M. L., & McLaughlin, K. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
McLaughlin, Katie A.
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
2016-11
Volume
125
Issue
8
Pages
1201-1212
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2549830953
Cited by
117
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
12.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • Smith ScholarWorks (Smith College) (submittedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (K01-MH092526, R01-MH103291, R01-106482, K01-MH092555, T32-HD057822)
  • Charles H. Hood Foundation
  • Jacobs Foundation
  • One Mind Institute
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
child abuse, depression, resilience, reward reactivity, adolescents, basal ganglia, globus pallidus, putamen, BOLD signal, monetary rewards, emotional stimuli
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Basal Ganglia, Brain Mapping, Child Abuse, Depression, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Reaction Time, Reward, Resilience, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review