Cited by 940AI in cancer detectionRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingCell Image Analysis Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 108 of the 111 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Machine Learning Methods for Histopathological Image Analysis

Open access
Komura, Daisuke, Ishikawa, Shumpei·2018·Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal

Abstract

Abundant accumulation of digital histopathological images has led to the increased demand for their analysis, such as computer-aided diagnosis using machine learning techniques. However, digital pathological images and related tasks have some issues to be considered. In this mini-review, we introduce the application of digital pathological image analysis using machine learning algorithms, address some problems specific to such analysis, and propose possible solutions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.csbj.2018.01.001

Cites

108 of 108 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Typical steps for machine learning in digital pathological image analysis. After preprocessing whole slide images, various types of machine learning algorithms could be applied including (a) supervised learning (see Section 2), (b) unsupervised learning (see Section 2), (c) semi-supervised learning (see Section 4.2.2), and (d) multiple instance learning (see Section 4.2.2). The histopathological images are adopted from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) [33].
Fig. 1 Typical steps for machine learning in digital pathological image analysis. After preprocessing whole slide images, various types of machine learning algorithms could be applied including (a) supervised learning (see Section 2), (b) unsupervised learning (see Section 2), (c) semi-supervised learning (see Section 4.2.2), and (d) multiple instance learning (see Section 4.2.2). The histopathological images are adopted from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) [33].CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Multiple magnification levels of the same histopathological image. Right images show the magnified region indicated by red box on the left images. Leftmost image clearly shows papillary structure, and rightmost image clearly shows nucleus of each cell. The histopathological images are adopted from TCGA [33].
Fig. 2 Multiple magnification levels of the same histopathological image. Right images show the magnified region indicated by red box on the left images. Leftmost image clearly shows papillary structure, and rightmost image clearly shows nucleus of each cell. The histopathological images are adopted from TCGA [33].CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 Artifacts in WSIs. Top: tumor region is outlined with red marker. The arrow indicates a tear possibly formed during the tissue preparation process. Left bottom: blurred image. Right bottom: folded tissue section. The histopathological images are adopted from TCGA [33].
Fig. 3 Artifacts in WSIs. Top: tumor region is outlined with red marker. The arrow indicates a tear possibly formed during the tissue preparation process. Left bottom: blurred image. Right bottom: folded tissue section. The histopathological images are adopted from TCGA [33].CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 4 Color variation of histopathological images. Both of these two images show lymphocytes. The histopathological images are adopted from TCGA [33].
Fig. 4 Color variation of histopathological images. Both of these two images show lymphocytes. The histopathological images are adopted from TCGA [33].CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 111 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Barry J.D., Fagny M., Paulson J.N., Aerts H., Platig J. and Quackenbush J.: Histopathological image QTL discovery of thyroid autoimmune disease variants. In: BioRxiv. : 2017.
  2. ScanNet: a fast and dense scanning framework for metastatic breast cancer detection from whole-slide images - semantic scholar. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ScanNet-A-Fast-and-Dense-Scanning-Framework-for-Me-Lin-Chen/9484287f4d5d52d10b5d362c462d4d6955655f8e.
  3. MICCAI grand challenge: tumor proliferation assessment challenge (TUPAC16). MICCAI Gd Chall Tumor Prolif Assess Chall TUPAC16. http://tupac.tue-image.nl/.
  4. KimiaPath24: dataset for retrieval and classification in digital pathology. : KIMIA Lab 2017.
  5. Tong S. and Koller D.: Support vector machine active learning with applications to text classification. J Mach Learn Res 2001; 2: 45.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 701–800 of 940

Metadata

Authors
Komura, D., & Ishikawa, S.
Affiliations
Tokyo Medical and Dental University (JP)
Corresponding author
Komura, Daisuke
Venue
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
Published
2018-01
Volume
16
Pages
34-42
ISSN
2001-0370 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2751723768
Cited by
937
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 95 · 2025: 111 · 2024: 104 · 2023: 122 · 2022: 114 · 2021: 140 · 2020: 146 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 17
FWCI
11.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
JSPS (25710020)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Keywords
digital histopathology, histopathology image analysis, computer-aided diagnosis, machine learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review