CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 128Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsPrimate Behavior and Ecology

Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) demonstrate robust memory for what and where, but not when, in an open-field test of memory

Hampton, Robert R., Hampstead, Benjamin M., Murray, Elisabeth A.·2005·Learning and Motivation
DOI 10.1016/j.lmot.2005.02.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.lmot.2005.02.004

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The sole attempt to evaluate www-memory in non-human primates has been done with rhesus macaques (Hampton et al. 2005).

    “The sole attempt to evaluate www-memory in non-human primates has been done with rhesus macaques (Hampton et al. 2005).”

    From Keeping track of time: evidence for episodic-like memory in great apes (2010) · cites this paper as Hampton et al. 2005

  • Macaques were unable to remember the when component of an event in Hampton et al.'s study.

    “In their study, Hampton and colleagues adapted the paradigm implemented by Clayton and Dickinson (1998) with the jays and they showed that macaques were unable to remember the when component of an event.”

    From Keeping track of time: evidence for episodic-like memory in great apes (2010) · cites this paper as Hampton et al. 2005

  • Other bird and mammal species have also been shown to possess episodic-like memory (what, where, when).

    “Other bird and mammal species have also been shown to possess such type of memory”

    From Keeping track of time: evidence for episodic-like memory in great apes (2010) · cites this paper as Hampton et al. 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Hampton, R. R., Hampstead, B. M., & Murray, E. A.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Hampton, Robert R.
ORCID
Venue
Learning and Motivation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-05
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
245-259
ISSN
0023-9690 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.lmot.2005.02.004
OpenAlex
W2117096666
Cited by
128
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Learning and Motivation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
rhesus monkeys, spatial memory, long-term memory, temporal memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review