Cited by 431Spatial Cognition and NavigationMemory and Neural MechanismsTactile and Sensory Interactions

Development of Cue Integration in Human Navigation

Open access
Nardini, Marko, Jones, Peter, Bedford, Rachael, Braddick, Oliver·2008·Current Biology

Abstract

Mammalian navigation depends both on visual landmarks and on self-generated (e.g., vestibular and proprioceptive) cues that signal the organism's own movement [1-5]. When these conflict, landmarks can either reset estimates of self-motion or be integrated with them [6-9]. We asked how humans combine these information sources and whether children, who use both from a young age [10-12], combine them as adults do. Participants attempted to return an object to its original place in an arena when given either visual landmarks only, nonvisual self-motion information only, or both. Adults, but not 4- to 5-year-olds or 7- to 8-year-olds, reduced their response variance when both information sources were available. In an additional "conflict" condition that measured relative reliance on landmarks and self-motion, we predicted behavior under two models: integration (weighted averaging) of the cues and alternation between them. Adults' behavior was predicted by integration, in which the cues were weighted nearly optimally to reduce variance, whereas children's behavior was predicted by alternation. These results suggest that development of individual spatial-representational systems precedes development of the capacity to combine these within a common reference frame. Humans can integrate spatial cues nearly optimally to navigate, but this ability depends on an extended developmental process.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.021

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some multisensory abilities are present from early infancy, but children do not integrate information across modalities to reduce sensory uncertainty until age ≥8 y.

    “Although some multisensory abilities are present from early infancy (6–8), in recent studies, children did not integrate information across modalities for shape discrimination, spatial localization, or detection of visual–auditory events until age ≥8 y (9–11).”

    From Fusion of visual cues is not mandatory in children (2010) · cites this paper as [9]

  • Sensory integration for uncertainty reduction did not emerge any earlier within the single modality of vision than across modalities in previous studies.

    “Sensory integration for uncertainty reduction therefore did not emerge any earlier within the single modality of vision than across modalities in previous studies (9, 10).”

    From Fusion of visual cues is not mandatory in children (2010) · cites this paper as [9]

  • The ability to reduce uncertainty by integrating information within a single modality does not necessarily develop any earlier than between modalities.

    “Therefore, the ability to reduce uncertainty by integrating information within a single modality does not necessarily develop any earlier than between modalities (9, 10).”

    From Fusion of visual cues is not mandatory in children (2010) · cites this paper as [9]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nardini, M., Jones, P., Bedford, R., & Braddick, O.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-05
Volume
18
Issue
9
Pages
689-693
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079810237
Cited by
431
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 16
FWCI
38.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/F017154/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
cue integration, spatial navigation, visual landmarks, self-motion cues, vestibular cues, proprioception, weighted averaging, spatial representation, response variance
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Cues, Female, Humans, Locomotion, Male, Models, Biological, Orientation, Proprioception, Space Perception, Vestibule, Labyrinth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review