Cited by 187Circadian rhythm and melatoninPhysiological and biochemical adaptationsCrustacean biology and ecology

Dissociation of circadian and circatidal timekeeping in the marine crustacean Eurydice pulchra

Open access
Zhang, Lin, Hastings, Michael H., Green, Edward W., Tauber, Eran, Sladek, Martin, Webster, Simon G., Kyriacou, Charalambos P., Wilcockson, David C.·2013·Current Biology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tidal (12.4 hr) cycles of behavior and physiology adapt intertidal organisms to temporally complex coastal environments, yet their underlying mechanism is unknown. However, the very existence of an independent "circatidal" clock has been disputed, and it has been argued that tidal rhythms arise as a submultiple of a circadian clock, operating in dual oscillators whose outputs are held in antiphase i.e., ~12.4 hr apart. RESULTS: We demonstrate that the intertidal crustacean Eurydice pulchra (Leach) exhibits robust tidal cycles of swimming in parallel to circadian (24 hr) rhythms in behavioral, physiological and molecular phenotypes. Importantly, ~12.4 hr cycles of swimming are sustained in constant conditions, they can be entrained by suitable stimuli, and they are temperature compensated, thereby meeting the three criteria that define a biological clock. Unexpectedly, tidal rhythms (like circadian rhythms) are sensitive to pharmacological inhibition of Casein kinase 1, suggesting the possibility of shared clock substrates. However, cloning the canonical circadian genes of E. pulchra to provide molecular markers of circadian timing and also reagents to disrupt it by RNAi revealed that environmental and molecular manipulations that confound circadian timing do not affect tidal timing. Thus, competent circadian timing is neither an inevitable nor necessary element of tidal timekeeping. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that tidal rhythms are driven by a dedicated circatidal pacemaker that is distinct from the circadian system of E. pulchra, thereby resolving a long-standing debate regarding the nature of the circatidal mechanism.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2013.08.038

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, L., Hastings, M. H., Green, E. W., Tauber, E., Sladek, M., Webster, S. G., Kyriacou, C. P., & Wilcockson, D. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology (GB)
  • Bangor University (GB)
  • Aberystwyth University (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Webster, Simon G.
  • Kyriacou, Charalambos P.
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
23
Issue
19
Pages
1863-1873
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2111762174
Cited by
187
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4
FWCI
7.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ASEP (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • University of Leicester
  • Medical Research Council
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/G02085X/1, BB/K009702/1, 91/517172, BB/E001750/1, BB/E000835/1, S17172)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Crustacean biology and ecology
Keywords
circatidal rhythm, circadian rhythm, Eurydice pulchra, intertidal crustaceans, biological clock, tidal rhythms, swimming behavior, casein kinase 1, clock genes, RNA interference, entrainment, temperature compensation
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Cell Line, Circadian Rhythm, Drosophila, Molecular Sequence Data, Periodicity, Pyrazoles, Pyrimidines, Swimming, Isopoda, RNA Interference, RNA, Small Interfering, Casein Kinase I, Tidal Waves, CLOCK Proteins, ARNTL Transcription Factors, Cryptochromes, Circadian Clocks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review