Cited by 452Neuroscience and Music PerceptionPhonetics and Phonology ResearchNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Human temporal-lobe response to vocal sounds

Belin, Pascal, Zatorre, Robert J, Ahad, Pierre·2002·Cognitive Brain Research

Abstract

Voice is not only the vehicle of speech, it is also an 'auditory face' that conveys a wealth of information on a person's identity and affective state. In contrast to speech perception, little is known about the neural bases of our ability to perceive these various types of paralinguistic vocal information. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we identified regions along the superior temporal sulcus (STS) that were not only sensitive, but also highly selective to vocal sounds. In the present study, we asked how neural activity in the voice areas was influenced by (i) the presence or not of linguistic information in the vocal input (speech vs. nonspeech) and (ii) frequency scrambling. Speech sounds were found to elicit greater responses than nonspeech vocalizations in most parts of auditory cortex, including primary auditory cortex (A1), on both sides of the brain. In contrast, response attenuation due to frequency scrambling was much more pronounced in anterior STS areas than at the level of A1. Importantly, only right anterior STS regions responded more strongly to nonspeech vocal sounds than to their scrambled version, suggesting that these regions could be specifically involved in paralinguistic aspects of voice perception.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0926-6410(01)00084-2

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Right lateralized auditory responses are observed for environmental sounds, non-linguistic vocal sounds like laughter, and the familiarity of vocalisation.

    “Right lateralized auditory responses were observed for environmental sounds (Specht and Reul, 2003; Thierry et al., 2003; Thierry and Price, 2006), non-linguistic vocal sounds like laughter (Belin et al., 2002; Kriegstein and Giraud, 2004; Meyer et al., 2005), and the familiarity of vocalisation (Kriegstein and Giraud, 2004).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Belin, P., Zatorre, R. J., & Ahad, P.
Affiliations
Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Belin, Pascal
Venue
Cognitive Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-02
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
17-26
ISSN
0926-6410 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2154479364
Cited by
452
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 24
FWCI
8.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognitive Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
voice perception, superior temporal sulcus, primary auditory cortex, speech perception, hemispheric lateralization, temporal lobe, auditory cortex
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Female, Fourier Analysis, Humans, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Phonetics, Sound, Sound Spectrography, Speech Perception, Temporal Lobe, Voice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review