Cited by 63Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationMarine Invertebrate Physiology and EcologyGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Early evolution of neurons

Open access
Kristan, William B.·2016·Current Biology

Abstract

How did a structure as complex as our own brain ever evolve? Although biologists have pondered this question since Charles Darwin, the explosion of molecular information in recent years has provided new insights into this question, particularly its first step: the evolution of neurons. Meshing information about genomes with insights from more classical anatomical, physiological, and developmental approaches has led to some remarkable insights and surprises. Because 'phylogenomics' is still a young field, however, there are arguments about which genes to include in comparisons, how much to weigh genetic versus 'classical' features, and which algorithms to use in making such comparisons. One source of serious discussion is the explanation for a feature being present in one clade (a group of animals with a common ancestor) but absent in a second clade. Does the feature's absence in clade 2 mean that the feature was never present in the ancestors of clade 2, or was it present in clade 2's ancestors but subsequently lost? A second phylogenomic problem is posed by convergent evolution (or 'homoplasy' in genetic terminology): a feature or a molecule that is present in two clades might have evolved independently in each clade. Both of these problems, secondary loss and homoplasy, confound the interpretation of evolutionary relationships. For the moment, the only solution to these problems is to compare more genes in more animals to see whether the features that are missing from one species, for instance, can be found in other closely-related species. The purpose of this primer is not to consider the evolution of brains, however, but the more modest goal of determining the evolution of neurons, the information processing cells that compose brains. Even this more limited goal is, at this juncture, beyond our reach, but the journey to this goal has already uncovered some remarkable relationships and has made clearer what are the key questions and how they can be approached.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2016.05.030

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The evolution of neurons and neural circuits allowed life to overcome the limitations imposed by diffusion-limited communication.

    “The evolution of neurons [247] and neural circuits [248] allowed life to overcome the limitations imposed by diffusion-limited communication [249].”

    From Fundamental constraints to the logic of living systems (2024) · cites this paper as [247]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kristan, W. B.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Kristan, William B.
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-10
Volume
26
Issue
20
Pages
R949-R954
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2539128088
Cited by
63
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
phylogenomics, brain evolution, secondary losses, homoplasy, convergent evolution, gene loss, comparative genomics, neuronal development
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Evolution, Neurons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review