Cited by 112Marine Invertebrate Physiology and EcologyGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesProtist diversity and phylogeny

Support for a clade of Placozoa and Cnidaria in genes with minimal compositional bias

Open access
Laumer, Christopher E, Gruber-Vodicka, Harald, Hadfield, Michael G, Pearse, Vicki B, Riesgo, Ana, Marioni, John C, Giribet, Gonzalo·2018·eLife

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The phylogenetic placement of the morphologically simple placozoans is crucial to understanding the evolution of complex animal traits. Here, we examine the influence of adding new genomes from placozoans to a large dataset designed to study the deepest splits in the animal phylogeny. Using site-heterogeneous substitution models, we show that it is possible to obtain strong support, in both amino acid and reduced-alphabet matrices, for either a sister-group relationship between Cnidaria and Placozoa, or for Cnidaria and Bilateria as seen in most published work to date, depending on the orthologues selected to construct the matrix. We demonstrate that a majority of genes show evidence of compositional heterogeneity, and that support for the Cnidaria + Bilateria clade can be assigned to this source of systematic error. In interpreting these results, we caution against a peremptory reading of placozoans as secondarily reduced forms of little relevance to broader discussions of early animal evolution.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.36278

Cites

103 of 106 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The RL2 findings support recent efforts pairing recoding and site-heterogeneous models to resolve difficult, ancient nodes in animal phylogeny, despite the erosion of data relevant to more shallow nodes.

    “The RL2 findings also support recent efforts pairing recoding and site-heterogeneous models to resolve difficult, ancient nodes in animal phylogeny5,9,24,33, despite the erosion of data relevant to more shallow nodes.”
  • The recovery of Placozoa as sister to Cnidaria in recoded WEA15 analyses is in-line with the proposal that compositional heterogeneity obscures this relationship.

    “We also recovered Placozoa as sister to Cnidaria in our recoded analyses of the WEA15 dataset (RL1 UFBOOT = 54%; RL2 UFBOOT = 90%) (Supplementary Fig. 22), in-line with the proposal that compositional heterogeneity obscures this relationship33.”
  • Some recent studies have reported Placozoa as sister to Cnidaria (sometimes paired with Ctenophora second) when minimizing compositional heterogeneity.

    “Interestingly, some recent studies have reported Placozoa as sister to Cnidaria (sometimes paired with Ctenophora second) when minimizing compositional heterogeneity5,33, and we have also recovered some support for this (RL2 analysis of WEA15 dataset) (Fig. 3c).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Laumer, C. E., Gruber-Vodicka, H., Hadfield, M. G., Pearse, V. B., Riesgo, A., Marioni, J. C., & Giribet, G.
Affiliations
  • European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
  • Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Bremen, Germany
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • Natural History Museum (GB)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Laumer, Christopher E
Venue
eLife
Published
2018-10-30
Volume
7
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2898892386
Cited by
112
References
104
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 2
FWCI
11.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
  • Max-Planck-Institut fuer Marine Microbiologie
  • European Bioinformatics Institute
  • Harvard University (Faculty of Arts and Sciences)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protist diversity and phylogeny
Keywords
Placozoa, Cnidaria, animal phylogeny, compositional heterogeneity, early animal evolution, sister group relationships
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Composition, Bayes Theorem, Cnidaria, Models, Genetic, Phylogeny, Bias, Likelihood Functions, Metagenome, Placozoa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review