Cited by 147Astrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsGamma-ray bursts and supernovae

THE FERMI BUBBLES: SUPERSONIC ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEUS JETS WITH ANISOTROPIC COSMIC-RAY DIFFUSION

Open access
Yang, H.-Y. K., Ruszkowski, M., Ricker, P. M., Zweibel, E., Lee, D.·2012·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

The Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope reveals two large bubbles in the Galaxy, which extend nearly symmetrically ∼50° above and below the Galactic center. Using three-dimensional (3D) magnetohydrodynamic simulations that self-consistently include the dynamical interaction between cosmic rays (CRs) and thermal gas and anisotropic CR diffusion along the magnetic field lines, we show that the key characteristics of the observed gamma-ray bubbles and the spatially correlated X-ray features in the ROSAT 1.5 keV map can be successfully reproduced by recent jet activity from the central active galactic nucleus. We find that after taking into account the projection of the 3D bubbles onto the sky the physical heights of the bubbles can be much smaller than previously thought, greatly reducing the formation time of the bubbles to about a Myr. This relatively small bubble age is needed to reconcile the simulations with the upper limit of bubble ages estimated from the cooling time of high-energy electrons. No additional physical mechanisms are required to suppress large-scale hydrodynamic instabilities because the evolution time is too short for them to develop. The simulated CR bubbles are edge-brightened, which is consistent with the observed projected flat surface brightness distribution. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the sharp edges of the observed bubbles can be due to anisotropic CR diffusion along magnetic field lines that drape around the bubbles during their supersonic expansion, with suppressed perpendicular diffusion across the bubble surface. Possible causes of the slight bends of the Fermi bubbles to the west are also discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/761/2/185

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The short cooling time of the cosmic-ray electrons requires the age of the Fermi bubbles to be tfb≲tIC,cool≈2 Myr.

    “The short cooling time of the CRe requires the age of the FBs, t fb ≲ t IC , cool ≈ 2 Myr (Guo & Mathews 2012; Guo et al. 2012; Yang et al. 2012).”

    From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Yang et al. 2012

  • Jet-driven bubbles have been simulated in the context of the Fermi bubbles where the jet is injected for a short period of about 0.1-0.5 Myr with jet power Ljet∼(1-3)×10^44 erg/s, i.e. 0.2-0.5 Eddington luminosity, and total energy ∼10^57 erg.

    “Jet-driven bubbles have been simulated in the context of the FBs where the jet is injected for a short period of time ( ∼ 0 . 1 -0 . 5 Myr) with jet power, L jet ∼ (1 -3) × 10 44 erg s -1 i.e., 0 . 2 -0 . 5 L edd and total energy ∼ 10 57 erg (Guo et al. 2012; Guo & Mathews 2012; Yang et al. 2012, 2013; Yang & Ruszkowski 2017; Yang et al. 2022).”

    From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Yang et al. 2012

  • Magnetic draping of the ambient magnetic fields can suppress instabilities as well as cosmic-ray diffusion across the bubbles, and thereby maintain a smooth and sharp edge.

    “Additionally, the magnetic draping of the ambient magnetic fields can suppress such instabilities as well as CR diffusion across the bubbles, and thereby, maintain a smooth and sharp edge (Yang et al. 2012).”

    From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Yang et al. 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, H.-Y. K., Ruszkowski, M., Ricker, P. M., Zweibel, E., & Lee, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Yang, H.-Y. K.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2012-12-06
Volume
761
Issue
2
Pages
185
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2023693056
Cited by
147
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 9
FWCI
5.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Keywords
Fermi bubbles, magnetohydrodynamic simulations, Galactic Center

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review