Cited by 522Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Materials ScienceAdvanced Graph Neural Networks

A compact review of molecular property prediction with graph neural networks

Open access
Wieder, Oliver, Kohlbacher, Stefan, Kuenemann, Mélaine, Garon, Arthur, Ducrot, Pierre, Seidel, Thomas, Langer, Thierry·2020·Drug Discovery Today: Technologies

Abstract

As graph neural networks are becoming more and more powerful and useful in the field of drug discovery, many pharmaceutical companies are getting interested in utilizing these methods for their own in-house frameworks. This is especially compelling for tasks such as the prediction of molecular properties which is often one of the most crucial tasks in computer-aided drug discovery workflows. The immense hype surrounding these kinds of algorithms has led to the development of many different types of promising architectures and in this review we try to structure this highly dynamic field of AI-research by collecting and classifying 80 GNNs that have been used to predict more than 20 molecular properties using 48 different datasets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ddtec.2020.11.009

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Yang K, Swanson K, Jin W, Coley C, Eiden P, Gao H, et al. Analyzing learned molecular representations for property prediction. J Chem Inform Model 2019;59(8):3370-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00237. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Hao Z, Lu C, Huang Z, Wang H, Hu Z, Liu Q, et al. ASGN: an active semi- supervised graph neural network for molecular property prediction; 2007, arXiv:2007.03196v1. · arXiv
  3. Hu W, Fey M, Zitnik M, Dong Y, Ren H, Liu B, et al. Open graph benchmark: datasets for machine learning on graphs; 2020, arXiv:2005. 00687v4 [cs.LG].

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wieder, O., Kohlbacher, S., Kuenemann, M., Garon, A., Ducrot, P., Seidel, T., & Langer, T.
Affiliations
University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Langer, Thierry
Venue
Drug Discovery Today: Technologies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
37
Pages
1-12
ISSN
1740-6749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3110901318
Cited by
522
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 83 · 2025: 119 · 2024: 129 · 2023: 100 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 22 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug Discovery Today Technologies (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
Keywords
graph neural networks, molecular property prediction, computational drug discovery
MeSH terms
Neural Networks, Computer, Drug Discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review