PreprintCited by 2,628Computational Drug Discovery MethodsAdvanced Graph Neural NetworksGraph theory and applications

Convolutional Networks on Graphs for Learning Molecular Fingerprints

Open access
Duvenaud, David, Maclaurin, Dougal, Aguilera-Iparraguirre, Jorge, Gómez-Bombarelli, Rafael, Hirzel, Timothy, Aspuru-Guzik, Alán, Adams, Ryan P.·2015·arXiv

Abstract

We introduce a convolutional neural network that operates directly on graphs. These networks allow end-to-end learning of prediction pipelines whose inputs are graphs of arbitrary size and shape. The architecture we present generalizes standard molecular feature extraction methods based on circular fingerprints. We show that these data-driven features are more interpretable, and have better predictive performance on a variety of tasks.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1509.09292

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GCNNs have been used to model drug combinations, drug-target interactions, and multiple property predictions.

    “GCNNs have been used to model drug combinations (90), drug-target interactions (91), and multiple property predictions (92).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duvenaud, D., Maclaurin, D., Aguilera-Iparraguirre, J., Gómez-Bombarelli, R., Hirzel, T., Aspuru-Guzik, A., & Adams, R. P.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2015
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2173027866
Cited by
2,628
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 138 · 2024: 260 · 2023: 289 · 2022: 351 · 2021: 525 · 2020: 458 · 2019: 359 · 2018: 171 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Graph theory and applications
Keywords
graph convolutional networks, molecular fingerprints, end-to-end learning, interpretable features, molecular property prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review