Cited by 137Epigenetics and DNA MethylationGenetic Syndromes and ImprintingSperm and Testicular Function

Genetic and Epigenetic Variation, but Not Diet, Shape the Sperm Methylome

Open access
Shea, Jeremy M., Serra, Ryan W., Carone, Benjamin R., Shulha, Hennady P., Kucukural, Alper, Ziller, Michael J., Vallaster, Markus P., Gu, Hongcang +5 more·2015·Developmental Cell

Abstract

Paternal diet can impact metabolic phenotypes in offspring, but mechanisms underlying such intergenerational information transfer remain obscure. Here, we interrogate cytosine methylation patterns in sperm obtained from mice consuming one of three diets, generating whole genome methylation maps for four pools of sperm samples and for 12 individual sperm samples, as well as 61 genome-scale methylation maps. We find that "epivariation," either stochastic or due to unknown demographic or environmental factors, was a far stronger contributor to the sperm methylome than was the diet consumed. Variation in cytosine methylation was particularly dramatic over tandem repeat families, including ribosomal DNA (rDNA) repeats, but rDNA methylation was strongly correlated with genetic variation in rDNA copy number and was not influenced by paternal diet. These results identify loci of genetic and epigenetic lability in the mammalian genome but argue against a direct role for sperm cytosine methylation in dietary reprogramming of offspring metabolism.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.11.024

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies on transgenerational effects of endocrine disruptors and of high fat diet on the DNA methylome have recently been challenged by others.

    “While most of published studies are technically sound, the majority still await independent confirmation; studies on transgenerational effects of endocrine disruptors and of high fat diet on the DNA methylome have recently been challenged by others10,11.”

    From A critical view on transgenerational epigenetic inheritance in humans (2018) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports no consistent effect of high-fat diet on the mouse sperm methylome, supporting the claim that dietary methylation effects have been challenged. Our copy does not address endocrine disruptors, and the Results caution that differences in strain and regimen mean its findings do not necessarily dispute a prior dietary report. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Akalin A Kormaksson M Li S Garrett-Bakelman FE Figueroa ME Melnick A Mason CE 2012 methylKit: a comprehensive R package for the analysis of genome-wide DNA methylation profiles Genome biology 13 R87 23034086 PMC3491415
  2. Aldrich JC Maggert KA 2015 Transgenerational inheritance of diet-induced genome rearrangements in Drosophila PLoS genetics 11 e1005148 25885886 PMC4401788
  3. Anderson LM Riffle L Wilson R Travlos GS Lubomirski MS Alvord WG 2006 Preconceptional fasting of fathers alters serum glucose in offspring of mice Nutrition 22 327 331 16500559
  4. Bock C Tomazou EM Brinkman AB Muller F Simmer F Gu H Jager N Gnirke A Stunnenberg HG Meissner A 2010 Quantitative comparison of genome-wide DNA methylation mapping technologies Nature biotechnology 28 1106 1114 PMC3066564 20852634
  5. Boyle P Clement K Gu H Smith ZD Ziller M Fostel JL Holmes L Meldrim J Kelley F Gnirke A 2012 Gel-free multiplexed reduced representation bisulfite sequencing for large-scale DNA methylation profiling Genome biology 13 R92 23034176 PMC3491420
  6. Carone BR Fauquier L Habib N Shea JM Hart CE Li R Bock C Li C Gu H Zamore PD 2010 Paternally induced transgenerational environmental reprogramming of metabolic gene expression in mammals Cell 143 1084 1096 21183072 PMC3039484
  7. Cedar H Bergman Y 2012 Programming of DNA methylation patterns Annual review of biochemistry 81 97 117 22404632
  8. Daxinger L Whitelaw E 2012 Understanding transgenerational epigenetic inheritance via the gametes in mammals Nature reviews Genetics 13 153 162 22290458
  9. Deaton AM Bird A 2011 CpG islands and the regulation of transcription Genes & development 25 1010 1022 21576262 PMC3093116
  10. Feinberg AP Irizarry RA 2010 Evolution in health and medicine Sackler colloquium: Stochastic epigenetic variation as a driving force of development, evolutionary adaptation, and disease Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107 Suppl 1 1757 1764 20080672 PMC2868296
  11. Feng S Jacobsen SE Reik W 2010 Epigenetic reprogramming in plant and animal development Science (New York, N Y 330 622 627 PMC2989926 21030646
  12. Gibbons JG Branco AT Yu S Lemos B 2014 Ribosomal DNA copy number is coupled with gene expression variation and mitochondrial abundance in humans Nature communications 5 4850 25209200
  13. Harris A Seckl J 2010 Glucocorticoids, prenatal stress and the programming of disease Horm Behav 59 279 289 20591431
  14. Irizarry RA Ladd-Acosta C Wen B Wu Z Montano C Onyango P Cui H Gabo K Rongione M Webster M 2009 The human colon cancer methylome shows similar hypo- and hypermethylation at conserved tissue-specific CpG island shores Nature genetics 41 178 186 19151715 PMC2729128
  15. Jimenez-Chillaron JC Isganaitis E Charalambous M Gesta S Pentinat-Pelegrin T Faucette RR Otis JP Chow A Diaz R Ferguson-Smith A 2009 Intergenerational transmission of glucose intolerance and obesity by in utero undernutrition in mice Diabetes 58 460 468 19017762 PMC2628621
  16. Li M Sloboda DM Vickers MH 2011 Maternal obesity and developmental programming of metabolic disorders in offspring: evidence from animal models Exp Diabetes Res 2011 592408 21969822 PMC3182397
  17. Lumey L Stein AD Kahn HS van der Pal-de Bruin KM Blauw G Zybert PA Susser ES 2007 Cohort Profile: the Dutch Hunger Winter Families Study Int J Epidemiol 17591638
  18. Molaro A Hodges E Fang F Song Q McCombie WR Hannon GJ Smith AD 2011 Sperm methylation profiles reveal features of epigenetic inheritance and evolution in primates Cell 146 1029 1041 21925323 PMC3205962
  19. Nagy A 2003 Manipulating the mouse embryo: a laboratory manual 3 Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
  20. Ng SF Lin RC Laybutt DR Barres R Owens JA Morris MJ 2010 Chronic high-fat diet in fathers programs beta-cell dysfunction in female rat offspring Nature 467 963 966 20962845
  21. Paredes S Branco AT Hartl DL Maggert KA Lemos B 2011 Ribosomal DNA deletions modulate genome-wide gene expression: “rDNA-sensitive” genes and natural variation PLoS genetics 7 e1001376 21533076 PMC3080856
  22. Pembrey ME Bygren LO Kaati G Edvinsson S Northstone K Sjostrom M Golding J 2006 Sex-specific, male-line transgenerational responses in humans Eur J Hum Genet 14 159 166 16391557
  23. Radford EJ Isganaitis E Jimenez-Chillaron J Schroeder J Molla M Andrews S Didier N Charalambous M McEwen K Marazzi G 2012 An unbiased assessment of the role of imprinted genes in an intergenerational model of developmental programming PLoS genetics 8 e1002605 22511876 PMC3325178
  24. Radford EJ Ito M Shi H Corish JA Yamazawa K Isganaitis E Seisenberger S Hore TA Reik W Erkek S 2014 In utero undernourishment perturbs the adult sperm methylome and intergenerational metabolism Science (New York, NY PMC4404520 25011554
  25. Rando OJ Simmons RA 2015 I’m Eating for Two: Parental Dietary Effects on Offspring Metabolism Cell 161 93 105 25815988 PMC4465102
  26. Schmitz RJ Schultz MD Lewsey MG O’Malley RC Urich MA Libiger O Schork NJ Ecker JR 2011 Transgenerational epigenetic instability is a source of novel methylation variants Science (New York, N Y 334 369 373 PMC3210014 21921155
  27. Shiao YH Crawford EB Anderson LM Patel P Ko K 2005 Allele-specific germ cell epimutation in the spacer promoter of the 45S ribosomal RNA gene after Cr(III) exposure Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 205 290 296 15922014
  28. Shiao YH Leighty RM Wang C Ge X Crawford EB Spurrier JM McCann SD Fields JR Fornwald L Riffle L 2012 Molecular and organismal changes in offspring of male mice treated with chemical stressors Environ Mol Mutagen 53 392 407 22674528 PMC12379820
  29. Smith ZD Chan MM Mikkelsen TS Gu H Gnirke A Regev A Meissner A 2012 A unique regulatory phase of DNA methylation in the early mammalian embryo Nature 484 339 344 22456710 PMC3331945
  30. Watkins AJ Sinclair KD 2014 Paternal low protein diet affects adult offspring cardiovascular and metabolic function in mice American journal of physiology Heart and circulatory physiology 306 H1444 1452 24658019
  31. Wei Y Yang CR Wei YP Zhao ZA Hou Y Schatten H Sun QY 2014 Paternally induced transgenerational inheritance of susceptibility to diabetes in mammals Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111 1873 1878 24449870 PMC3918818
  32. Whitelaw NC Whitelaw E 2008 Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance in health and disease Curr Opin Genet Dev 18 273 279 18662779
  33. Xi Y Li W 2009 BSMAP: whole genome bisulfite sequence MAPping program BMC bioinformatics 10 232 19635165 PMC2724425
  34. Ziller MJ Hansen KD Meissner A Aryee MJ 2015 Coverage recommendations for methylation analysis by whole-genome bisulfite sequencing Nature methods 12 230 232 231 following 232 25362363 PMC4344394

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shea, J. M., Serra, R. W., Carone, B. R., Shulha, H. P., Kucukural, A., Ziller, M. J., Vallaster, M. P., Gu, H., Tapper, A. R., Gardner, P. D., Meissner, A., Garber, M., & Rando, O. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
  • Broad Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Rando, Oliver J.
Venue
Developmental Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
35
Issue
6
Pages
750-758
ISSN
1534-5807 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2217449599
Cited by
137
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 1
FWCI
8.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001453, UL1TR000161)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA033664, R01DA036898, F32DA034414)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (DP1ES025458)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD080224, R01HD078679, T32HD007439)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
Keywords
sperm methylome, cytosine methylation, paternal diet, intergenerational epigenetic inheritance, ribosomal DNA repeats, rDNA copy number, tandem repeats, genome-wide methylation mapping
MeSH terms
Animals, Diet, DNA, Ribosomal, Male, Spermatozoa, Genetic Variation, Genome, DNA Methylation, Epigenesis, Genetic, Mice, Epigenomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review