Cited by 292Epigenetics and DNA MethylationSperm and Testicular FunctionGenetic Syndromes and Imprinting

Daddy Issues: Paternal Effects on Phenotype

Open access
Rando, Oliver J.·2012·Cell

Abstract

The once popular and then heretical idea that ancestral environment can affect the phenotype of future generations is coming back into vogue due to advances in the field of epigenetic inheritance. How paternal environmental conditions influence the phenotype of progeny is now a tractable question, and researchers are exploring potential mechanisms underlying such effects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.020

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because of imprinting, maternal and paternal genomes are differentially marked and re-programmed, and a small number of regions from the DNA of the parent of origin may remain with DNA methylation intact.

    “Because of a phenomenon called imprinting, maternal and paternal genomes are differentially marked and re-programmed, and a small number of regions from the DNA of the parent of origin may remain with DNA methylation intact 173,189,191”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rando, O. J.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
Corresponding author
Rando, Oliver J.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-11
Volume
151
Issue
4
Pages
702-708
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2161536630
Cited by
292
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 11
FWCI
8.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA033664)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM088618)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
Keywords
paternal effects, epigenetic inheritance, transgenerational epigenetic inheritance, ancestral environment, phenotypes, epigenetic mechanisms
MeSH terms
Animals, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Male, Phenotype, Plants, Epigenesis, Genetic, Gene-Environment Interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review