Cited by 1,834Health disparities and outcomesPublic Health and Social InequalitiesHealthcare Systems and Challenges

Health equity in England: the Marmot review 10 years on

Open access
Marmot, Michael·2020·BMJ

Abstract

Ten years after the landmark review on health inequalities in England, coauthor Michael Marmot says the situation has become worse

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.m693

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marmot, M.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Marmot, Michael
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2020-02-24
Volume
368
Pages
m693
ISSN
1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3008881689
Cited by
1,834
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 212 · 2025: 239 · 2024: 295 · 2023: 319 · 2022: 332 · 2021: 291 · 2020: 145 · 2015: 1
FWCI
150.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • OpenDocs (Institute of Development Studies) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • British Heart Foundation (RG/07/008/23674)
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/F02679X/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Challenges
Keywords
health equity, health disparities, Marmot Review, social determinants of health, health policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review