Cited by 206Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesDiabetes Treatment and ManagementMinimally Invasive Surgical Techniques

Effect of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery on type 2 diabetes mellitus with hypertension: A randomized controlled trial

Liang, Ziwen, Wu, Qinan, Chen, Bing, Yu, Peiwu, Zhao, Hongliang, Ouyang, Xinshou·2013·Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

Abstract

Aims The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery compared with usual care with and without Exenatide therapy in obese people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hypertension.Methods 108 obese T2DM with hypertension were enrolled and randomly allocated to usual care (group A), usual care plus Exenatide (group B), and RYGB surgery (group C). Demographic characteristics, metabolic parameters and cardiac structure/function along with inflammatory cytokines were measured and compared before and after 12 months.Results At 12 months, diabetes remission had occurred in no patients in groups A and B versus 90% in group C, and there was a significant decrease in requirement of antihypertensive drugs in group C compared with groups A and B (P<0.05). Other parameters (body mass index, hemoglobin A1c, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, lipids), inflammation index (high sensitivity C-reactive protein, tumor necrosis factor-α, high molecular weight adiponectin) and cardiac structure (left ventricular mass index) were significantly improved in groups B and C, but patients in group C had the greatest degree of improvement (P<0.05).Conclusion RYGB surgery improves a number of parameters including cardiovascular function in obese hypertensive people with T2DM. This is likely to be due to, at least in part, an improvement in the abnormal metabolic panel and to reduced inflammation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.04.005

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liang, Z., Wu, Q., Chen, B., Yu, P., Zhao, H., & Ouyang, X.
Affiliations
  • Army Medical University (CN)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Liang, Ziwen
Venue
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
101
Issue
1
Pages
50-56
ISSN
0168-8227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2140334292
Cited by
206
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 1
FWCI
20.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
Keywords
laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, obesity, exenatide, diabetes remission, insulin resistance, inflammation, cardiac structure, left ventricular mass, C-reactive protein, adiponectin, TNF-α
MeSH terms
Adult, C-Reactive Protein, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Laparoscopy, Prognosis, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Gastric Bypass, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review