Cited by 74Retinal Imaging and AnalysisRetinal Diseases and TreatmentsHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Preventing diabetes blindness: Cost effectiveness of a screening programme using digital non-mydriatic fundus photography for diabetic retinopathy in a primary health care setting in South Africa

Khan, Taskeen, Bertram, Melanie Y., Jina, Ruxana, Mash, Bob, Levitt, Naomi, Hofman, Karen·2013·Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

Abstract

Background South Africa like many other developing countries is experiencing an epidemiologic transition with a marked increase in the non-communicable disease (NCD) burden. Diabetic retinopathy is the most common cause of incidental blindness in adults. A screening programme using a mobile fundal camera in a primary care setting has been shown to be effective in the country. Information on affordability and cost is essential for policymakers to consider its adoption. Methods Economic evaluation is the comparative analysis of competing alternative interventions in terms of costs and consequences. A cost effectiveness analysis was done using actual costs from the primary care screening programme. Results A total of 14,541 patients were screened in three primary healthcare facilities in the Western Cape. Photographs were taken by a trained technician with supervision by an ophthalmic nurse. The photographs were then read by a medical officer with ophthalmic experience. A cost effective ratio of $1206 per blindness case averted was obtained. This included costs for screening and treating an individual. The cost just to screen a patient for retinopathy was $22. The costs of screening and treating all incident cases of blindness due to diabetes in South Africa would be 168,000,000 ZAR ($19,310,344) per annum. Conclusion Non mydriatic digital fundoscopy is a cost effective measure in the screening and diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy in a primary care setting in South Africa. The major savings in the long term are a result of avoiding government disability grant for people who suffer loss of vision.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.05.006

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Image acquisition was often performed by trained non-physician staff, while final grading was typically carried out by ophthalmologists or retinal specialists in 22 out of 30 studies.

    “Image acquisition was often performed by trained non-physician staff (technicians, optometrists, nurses, paramedics), while final grading was typically carried out by ophthalmologists or retinal specialists (22/30 studies) [8–13, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22, 24, 26, 27, 30–37]”
  • Mydriasis was employed in 17 out of 30 studies, while the remainder used non-mydriatic techniques when clinically appropriate.

    “Mydriasis was employed in 17/30 studies, while the remainder used non-mydriatic techniques when clinically appropriate [9, 12, 18, 22, 24, 27, 33, 35, 36].”
  • The International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy severity scale was the most commonly utilized severity scale, used in 15 out of 30 studies.

    “Various severity scales are used to classify diabetic retinopathy (DR), with the International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy (ICDR) severity scale being the most commonly utilized in 15 out of 30 studies [9, 11–13, 15, 18, 21–23, 32, 34–36].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khan, T., Bertram, M. Y., Jina, R., Mash, B., Levitt, N., & Hofman, K.
Affiliations
  • University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
Corresponding author
  • Khan, Taskeen
  • Bertram, Melanie Y.
  • Jina, Ruxana
  • Levitt, Naomi
  • Hofman, Karen
Venue
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-08
Volume
101
Issue
2
Pages
170-176
ISSN
0168-8227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091014566
Cited by
74
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
5.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
diabetic retinopathy, non-mydriatic fundus photography, retinopathy screening, cost-effectiveness, primary care, non-communicable diseases, disability grants, Western Cape
MeSH terms
Cost-Benefit Analysis, Diabetic Retinopathy, Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological, Fundus Oculi, Humans, Photography, South Africa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review