Cited by 414Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Comparison of basal insulin added to oral agents versus twice-daily premixed insulin as initial insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes

Open access
Janka, Hans U., Plewe, Gerd, Riddle, Matthew C., Kliebe-Frisch, Christine, Schweitzer, Matthias A., Yki-Järvinen, Hannele·2005·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—To compare the efficacy and safety of adding once-daily basal insulin versus switching to twice-daily premixed insulin in type 2 diabetic patients insufficiently controlled by oral antidiabetic agents (OADs). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—In a 24-week, multinational, multicenter, open, parallel group clinical trial, 371 insulin-naïve patients with poor glycemic control (fasting blood glucose [FBG] ≥120 mg/dl, HbA1c 7.5–10.5%) on OADs (sulfonylurea plus metformin) were randomized to once-daily morning insulin glargine plus glimepiride and metformin (glargine plus OAD) or to 30% regular/70% human NPH insulin (70/30) twice daily without OADs. Insulin dosage was titrated to target FBG ≤100 mg/dl (both insulins) and predinner blood glucose ≤100 mg/dl (70/30 only) using a weekly forced-titration algorithm. RESULTS—Mean HbA1c decrease from baseline was significantly more pronounced (−1.64 vs. −1.31%, P = 0.0003), and more patients reached HbA1c ≤7.0% without confirmed nocturnal hypoglycemia (45.5 vs. 28.6%, P = 0.0013) with glargine plus OAD than with 70/30. Similarly, FBG decrease was greater with glargine plus OAD (adjusted mean difference −17 mg/dl [–0.9 mmol/l], P < 0.0001), and more patients reached target FBG ≤100 mg/dl with glargine plus OAD than with 70/30 (31.6 vs. 15.0%, P = 0.0001). Glargine plus OAD patients had fewer confirmed hypoglycemic episodes than 70/30 patients (mean 4.07 vs. 9.87/patient-year, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS—Initiating insulin treatment by adding basal insulin glargine once daily to glimepiride plus metformin treatment was safer and more effective than beginning twice-daily injections of 70/30 and discontinuing OADs in type 2 diabetic patients inadequately controlled with OADs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.28.2.254

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Basal insulin analogs reduce hypoglycemia risk compared with NPH insulin.

    “Basal insulin analogs are preferred over NPH insulin because of a reduced risk of hypoglycemia.1066–1071”

    From American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update. (2022) · cites this paper as [1070]

    The Hypoglycemia section reports fewer confirmed hypoglycemic episodes with glargine plus oral drugs than with twice-daily premixed 70/30 insulin, which contains NPH. The Conclusions clarify that the trial compared treatment regimens, not glargine directly against NPH alone; it therefore does not establish the claimed risk reduction for basal insulin analogs versus NPH insulin generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Glargine was also associated with a lower frequency of hypoglycemia than premixed insulins.

    “Glargine was also associated with a lower frequency of hypoglycemia than premixed insulins (136,137).”

    From Hypoglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes (2005) · cites this paper as [136]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Janka, H. U., Plewe, G., Riddle, M. C., Kliebe-Frisch, C., Schweitzer, M. A., & Yki-Järvinen, H.
Affiliations
  • Zentralkrankenhaus, Bremen-Nord, Bremen, Germany
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • ABEnzymes (Germany) (DE)
  • Department of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2005-02-01
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
254-259
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2121414237
Cited by
414
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 18
FWCI
30.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
insulin glargine, basal insulin, premixed insulin, type 2 diabetes, oral antidiabetic drugs, glimepiride, metformin, sulfonylureas, glycemic control, HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, hypoglycemia, insulin-naive patients, insulin dose adjustment
MeSH terms
Insulin Glargine, Adult, Aged, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Male, Metformin, Middle Aged, Sulfonylurea Compounds, Weight Gain, Insulin, Long-Acting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review