Cited by 113Diabetes Management and ResearchPancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Gender differences in counterregulation to hypoglycaemia

Open access
Amiel, S. A., Maran, A., Powrie, J. K., Umpleby, A. M., Macdonald, I. A.·1993·Diabetologia

Abstract

To investigate the effect of gender on catecholamine responses to hypoglycaemia, single-step euglycaemic-hypoglycaemic clamps have been performed in 14 healthy men and 17 women. Adrenaline responses were 44% lower in females (p < 0.01) and noradrenaline 17% lower (p = 0.08). In response to low-dose intravenous insulin infusion (0.3 mU.kg-1.min-1), plasma glucose fall and counterregulation in seven men and seven women had a different course (p < 0.001), with different glucose kinetics. In men, endogenous glucose output recovered quickly to levels that exceeded basal; in women suppression of endogenous glucose output was more prolonged, without rates ever exceeding basal (p < 0.05). Peripheral glucose uptake was stimulated in men only. The hormones of acute glucose counterregulation (catecholamines and glucagon) did not differ between the sexes during this challenge, the catecholamine response in the women being supported by the continuous fall in plasma glucose. These results suggest that: 1) catecholamine responses to moderately controlled hypoglycaemia are diminished in women, and 2) peripheral insulin sensitivity in men is enhanced over that of women but hepatic sensitivity to insulin may be greater in women.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00402284

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amiel, S. A., Maran, A., Powrie, J. K., Umpleby, A. M., & Macdonald, I. A.
Affiliations
  • Guy's Hospital (GB)
  • St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
1993-05
Volume
36
Issue
5
Pages
460-464
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W2032344007
Cited by
113
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Leverhulme Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
sex differences, catecholamines, epinephrine, norepinephrine, insulin infusion, peripheral glucose uptake, insulin sensitivity, hepatic insulin sensitivity, glucagon, glucose kinetics
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Female, Homeostasis, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Infusions, Intravenous, Insulin, Kinetics, Male, Sex Characteristics, Time Factors, Glucose Clamp Technique, Multivariate Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review