Cited by 2Diabetes Management and ResearchClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlDiabetes Management and Education

Real-world data from Europe and Africa suggest that accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose is frequently impaired by low hematocrit

Open access
Hinzmann, Rolf, Militz, Daniel, Zima, Tomáš, Špaček, Martin, Storm, Huib, Chapanduka, Zivanai, Hauss, Oliver·2021·Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

Abstract

AIMS: Certain systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) demonstrate inaccuracy at low and high hematocrit (HCT). Manufacturers define HCT ranges for accurate performance. Our objective was to assess the frequency of HCT values that can lead to clinically relevant errors. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we collected real-world data representing over 360,000 outpatients from the Netherlands (NL), the Czech Republic (CZ), and South Africa (ZA). These were subsequently stratified by sex and age and compared to commonly specified HCT range limits, reference intervals, and data from 1780 healthy Czech subjects. RESULTS: HCT values were comparably distributed in NL and CZ. Outpatients had a higher dispersion of values than healthy subjects. Low HCT values in Europe were common in age groups with a high prevalence of diabetes. All ZA age groups showed a higher prevalence of low HCT than in Europe. CONCLUSIONS: Real-world data indicate that SMBG systems specified to perform only within the frequently used 30-55% HCT range would leave 3% of outpatients in Europe and 18% in South Africa at risk of false SMBG results, with individual age strata being substantially higher. This could affect their diabetes management. Adequate SMBG systems should thus be chosen.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.108860

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Baltaro RJ, Dangott BJ, Tanenberg RJ, Thombare A, Lin SF. Evaluation of Hematocrit and Hypoglycemia in a University Hospital: Blood Glucose Monitoring Experience Using Retrospective Data Analysis. Am. Diabetes Assoc. ADA 75th Sci. Sess., Boston, Massachusetts; 2015. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/193229681300700122. · DOI
  2. Shisana O, Labadarios D, Rehle T, Simbayi L, Zuma K, Dhansay A, et al. South African National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (SANHANES-1). Cape Town: HSRC Press; 2013.
  3. Hinzmann R. Accuracy of blood glucose monitoring is essential for correct therapy decisions 2019. Congress of the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) 2019, Roche Satellite Symposium; 2019. Busan, South Korea.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hinzmann, R., Militz, D., Zima, T., Špaček, M., Storm, H., Chapanduka, Z., & Hauss, O.
Affiliations
  • Roche Diabetes Care GmbH (Germany) (DE)
  • Charles University (CZ)
  • Stichting Certe Medische Diagnostiek en Advies (NL)
  • Stellenbosch University (ZA)
Corresponding author
Hinzmann, Rolf
Venue
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
177
Pages
108860
ISSN
0168-8227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3162529700
Cited by
2
References
18
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Roche Diabetes Care
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
self-monitoring of blood glucose, hematocrit, blood glucose meter accuracy, low hematocrit, measurement error, diabetes management, outpatients, age-stratified prevalence, reference values, South Africa, Europe
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Cross-Sectional Studies, Europe, Hematocrit, Humans, South Africa, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review