Cited by 144Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and Management

The effectiveness of patient activation intervention on type 2 diabetes mellitus glycemic control and self-management behaviors: A systematic review of RCTs

Almutairi, Nasser, Hosseinzadeh, Hassan, Gopaldasani, Vinod·2020·Primary Care Diabetes

Abstract

Background Type 2 diabetes mellitus T2DM is a major health challenge and associated with several complications and mortality. Self-management behaviors SMBs such as healthy diet, physical activity, blood glucose self-monitoring, foot care and medication adherence are critical part of diabetic care. Empowered or activated patients, are more likely to practice better SMBs. However, the effectiveness of patient activation intervention on T2DM glycemic control and SMBs is not totally well understood.Aim To assess the effectiveness of patient activation intervention on T2DM glycemic control and SMBs.Method A systematic search was undertaken through five databases to find relevant studies published between 2004 and 2018. We included randomized controlled trials with sample size ≥120 and follow up period of ≥12 months and assess the effectiveness of patient activation intervention on T2DM glycemic control and SMBs.Results 10 RCTs were identified for analysis. The total sample size is 3728 and the combined mean age is 57.3 years. The combined mean BMI is 31.2kg/m 2 (obese). Seven intervention demonstrated a significant reduction in HbA1c, ranged from 0.36 to 0.80%. All interventions presented an improvement in at least one self-management behavior.Discussion and conclusion Patient activation intervention showed a significant positive effect on T2DM glycemic control and SMBs, particularly physical activity, healthy diet, foot care and blood glucose self-monitoring. The effectiveness on SMBs was seen across different intervention strategies, modes of delivery, length of intervention, and number of providers. Better effectiveness on HbA1c was associated with poorly controlled participants, culturally tailored-intervention, and in-person sessions intervention combined with telephone calls follow up.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pcd.2019.08.009

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The development in technologies and infrastructures provides solid ground for digital health advancement, including penetration of cell phones and the internet.

    “The development in technologies and infrastructures provide solid ground for digital health advancement, including penetration of cell phones and the internet.”
  • Digital health designs that were integrated into existing healthcare model was a facilitator for successful uptake, and unintegrated digital health interventions that impose additional workload for primary healthcare providers is a barrier.

    “Digital health designs that were integrated into existing healthcare model was a facilitator for successful uptake, and unintegrated digital health interventions that impose additional workload for primary healthcare providers is a barrier.”
  • Motivational interviewing, patient activation, goal setting and action planning, problem-solving, tracking or self-monitoring health behaviors, and facilitating opportunities for social support are behavioral strategies with empirical support.

    “Behavioral strategies with empirical support include motivational interviewing (303-305), patient activation (306), goal setting and action planning (305,307-309), problem-solving (308,310), tracking or self-monitoring health behaviors with or without feedback from a health care professional (305,307-309), and facilitating opportunities for social support (305,308,309).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Almutairi, N., Hosseinzadeh, H., & Gopaldasani, V.
Affiliations
University of Wollongong (AU)
Corresponding author
Hosseinzadeh, Hassan
Venue
Primary Care Diabetes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
12-20
ISSN
1751-9918 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2974640377
Cited by
144
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Primary care diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
Funders
ministry of health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
patient activation, type 2 diabetes, glycemic control, HbA1c, self-management behavior, physical activity, healthy eating, foot care, self-monitoring of blood glucose, medication adherence, culturally tailored interventions, telephone follow-up
MeSH terms
Healthy Lifestyle, Diet, Healthy, Glycemic Control, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Patient Participation, Self Care, Biomarkers, Exercise, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Risk Reduction Behavior, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review