Cited by 58Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal and yeast genetics researchFungal Infections and Studies

Sterol uptake in Candida glabrata: Rescue of sterol auxotrophic strains

Bard, Martin, Sturm, Aaron M., Pierson, Charles A., Brown, Shaleak, Rogers, Kristina M., Nabinger, Sarah, Eckstein, James, Barbuch, Robert +3 more·2005·Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease

Abstract

Candida glabrata is emerging as a more common and important human pathogen. It is less susceptible to azole antifungals than Candida albicans, thus, posing some unique treatment challenges. Previously undetected C. glabrata isolates were identified from clinical specimens by adding bile to the growth medium. Cholesterol was found to be the responsible ingredient in bile. Six bile-dependent isolates were characterized and were found to exhibit wild-type equivalent growth when provided human or bovine serum or free cholesterol. Sterol profiles of the 6 isolates and a C. glabrata matching wild-type strain not requiring cholesterol indicated that 2 were defective in squalene epoxidase (encoded by the ERG1 gene) activity, 3 were defective in lanosterol synthase (encoded by the ERG7 gene) activity, and the sixth was defective in heme biosynthesis. All 7 isolates produced profiles that contained cholesterol transported from the media. Because Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants unable to synthesize heme will take up exogenous sterol under aerobic conditions, hem1 nulls of C. glabrata and C. albicans were generated and tested for growth on ergosterol media. Only the C. glabrata hem1 was able to grow indicating significant differences in exogenous sterol uptake between the 2 organisms. The ability of C. glabrata to replace ergosterol with host sterol may be responsible for its elevated azole resistance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2005.03.001

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bard, M., Sturm, A. M., Pierson, C. A., Brown, S., Rogers, K. M., Nabinger, S., Eckstein, J., Barbuch, R., Lees, N. D., Howell, S. A., & Hazen, K. C.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
  • St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
  • University of Virginia Health System (US)
Corresponding author
Bard, Martin
Venue
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-08
Volume
52
Issue
4
Pages
285-293
ISSN
0732-8893 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095159049
Cited by
58
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Burroughs Wellcome Fund
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM062104, GM 62104)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
Keywords
Candida glabrata, sterol uptake, sterol auxotrophy, cholesterol, squalene epoxidase, ERG1, lanosterol synthase, heme biosynthesis, azole resistance, ergosterol, Candida albicans
MeSH terms
Animals, Azoles, Candida albicans, Cattle, Cholesterol, Culture Media, Ergosterol, Fungal Proteins, Heme, Humans, Mutation, Sterols, Candida glabrata, Serum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review