Cited by 68Liver Diseases and ImmunityLiver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentLiver Disease and Transplantation

Performance and utility of transient elastography and noninvasive markers of liver fibrosis in primary biliary cirrhosis

Floreani, Annarosa, Cazzagon, Nora, Martines, Diego, Cavalletto, Luisa, Baldo, Vincenzo, Chemello, Liliana·2011·Digestive and Liver Disease

Abstract

Background The performance of transient elastography in primary biliary cirrhosis has yet to be fully established. Aim To assess: (1) the performance of transient elastography in identifying significant fibrosis in primary biliary cirrhosis by comparison with surrogate markers (AST platelet ratio index (APRI), FIB-4, Fibroindex, Forns, aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase ratio); (2) the correlation between liver stiffness and Mayo score prognostic index. Methods One hundred and twenty patients with primary biliary cirrhosis were consecutively enrolled. The performance of each marker and of liver stiffness was compared with histological staging and METAVIR at time of liver biopsy. Results The area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) of liver stiffness were 0.87, 0.88, 0.99 for histological stage ≥II, ≥III and =IV and 0.89, 0.92, 0.99 for METAVIR ≥2, ≥3 and =4. Transient elastography alone proved better able in identifying any grade of fibrosis or cirrhosis than noninvasive markers. Combining each surrogate marker with transient elastography did not improve the area under ROC. Transient elastography correlated positively with the Mayo score (P Conclusions Transient elastography proved a simple, reliable and useful method for assessing liver fibrosis in primary biliary cirrhosis, whereas noninvasive surrogate markers proved unsatisfactory in predicting significant fibrosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dld.2011.06.011

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LSM assessed by VCTE has been shown to be one of the best surrogate markers for detecting cirrhosis or severe fibrosis in PBC.

    “Liver stiffness measurement LSM, assessed by vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE), has been shown as one of the best surrogate markers for the detection of cirrhosis or severe fibrosis (i.e.bridging fibrosis) in patients with PBC [86][87][88].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Floreani, A., Cazzagon, N., Martines, D., Cavalletto, L., Baldo, V., & Chemello, L.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
Venue
Digestive and Liver Disease
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-07
Volume
43
Issue
11
Pages
887-92
ISSN
1590-8658 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077348069
Cited by
68
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Digestive and Liver Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease and Transplantation
Keywords
transient elastography, liver fibrosis, primary biliary cirrhosis, non-invasive fibrosis markers, AST to platelet ratio index, FIB-4, Forns index, liver stiffness, Mayo score, histological staging, liver biopsy
MeSH terms
Aged, Alanine Transaminase, Aspartate Aminotransferases, Elasticity, Female, Fibrosis, Humans, Liver, Liver Cirrhosis, Male, Middle Aged, Platelet Count, ROC Curve, Biomarkers, Logistic Models, Area Under Curve, Elasticity Imaging Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review