Cited by 19Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchGut microbiota and healthGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Donor program for fecal microbiota transplantation: A 3-year experience of a large-volume Italian stool bank

Ianiro, Gianluca, Porcari, Serena, Bibbò, Stefano, Giambò, Federica, Quaranta, Gianluca, Masucci, Luca, Sanguinetti, Maurizio, Gasbarrini, Antonio +1 more·2021·Digestive and Liver Disease

Abstract

Background Due to the increasing rise of C. difficile infection, stool banks and donor programs have been launched to grant access to fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). Our aim is to describe characteristics and outcomes of the donor program at our stool bank. Methods Donor candidates underwent a four-step selection process, including a clinical interview, blood and stool testing, a further questionnaire and a direct stool testing the day of each donation. From March 2020, specific changes to this process were introduced to avoid the potential transmission of COVID-19. We evaluated the rate of excluded candidates at each step of the screening, as well as the number of total fecal aliquots provided by qualified donors. Results Overall, 114 donor candidates were evaluated. Seventy-five candidates declined to join the program for logistic or personal issues, three were excluded after the questionnaire and seven for positive stool exams. Finally, 29 (25%) subjects qualified as stool donors, and provided 70 stool samples. Fifteen samples were excluded after direct molecular stool testing. A total of 127 aliquots was finally obtained. Conclusions Donor recruitment for FMT is a challenging process, and only a small rate of candidates are eligible as donors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dld.2021.04.009

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Ianiro, G., Porcari, S., Bibbò, S., Giambò, F., Quaranta, G., Masucci, L., Sanguinetti, M., Gasbarrini, A., & Cammarota, G.
Affiliations
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
Corresponding author
Cammarota, Giovanni
Venue
Digestive and Liver Disease
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-11
Volume
53
Issue
11
Pages
1428-1432
ISSN
1590-8658 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3165553292
Cited by
19
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Digestive and Liver Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
fecal microbiota transplantation, stool bank, donor selection, donor recruitment, Clostridium difficile infection, COVID-19 prevention, stool examination
MeSH terms
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation, Adult, Feces, Female, Humans, Italy, Male, Prospective Studies, Program Evaluation, Infection Control, Biological Specimen Banks, Donor Selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review