Cited by 598Computational Drug Discovery MethodsPharmaceutical Economics and PolicyHistorical Medical Research and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Drug repurposing: a promising tool to accelerate the drug discovery process

Open access

Abstract

Traditional drug discovery and development involves several stages for the discovery of a new drug and to obtain marketing approval. It is necessary to discover new strategies for reducing the drug discovery time frame. Today, drug repurposing has gained importance in identifying new therapeutic uses for already-available drugs. Typically, repurposing can be achieved serendipitously (unintentional fortunate observations) or through systematic approaches. Numerous strategies to discover new indications for FDA-approved drugs are discussed in this article. Drug repurposing has therefore become a productive approach for drug discovery because it provides a novel way to explore old drugs for new use but encounters several challenges. Some examples of different approaches are reviewed here.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drudis.2019.06.014

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 87 references

2 of the 87 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Repurposing drugs helps patients with rare diseases. Available at: https://www.elsevier.com/connect/repurposing-drugs-helps-patients-with-rare-diseases.
  2. Sekhon, 2013, Repositioning drugs and biologics: retargeting old/existing drugs for potential new therapeutic applications, J. Pharm. Educ. Res., 4, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–598 of 598

Metadata

Authors
Parvathaneni, V., Kulkarni, N. S., Muth, A., & Gupta, V.
Affiliations
St. John's University (US)
Corresponding author
Gupta, Vivek
Venue
Drug Discovery Today
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
24
Issue
10
Pages
2076-2085
ISSN
1359-6446 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2951512731
Cited by
597
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 80 · 2025: 137 · 2024: 130 · 2023: 96 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug Discovery Today (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Health Research Alliance (cc-by)
Funders
  • NIH (1R15HL138606-01A1)
  • American Heart Association (18AIREA33960072)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Historical Medical Research and Treatments
Keywords
drug repurposing, FDA-approved drugs, new therapeutic indications, serendipitous drug discovery, drug development challenges
MeSH terms
Humans, Drug Discovery, Drug Repositioning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review