Cited by 124Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Levodopa pharmacotherapy for cocaine dependence: choosing the optimal behavioral therapy platform

Open access
Schmitz, Joy M., Mooney, Marc E., Moeller, F. Gerard, Stotts, Angela L., Green, Charles, Grabowski, John·2008·Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Abstract

Background The dopamine precursor levodopa has shown some, albeit relatively weak, promise in treating cocaine dependence. This study sought to identify the most appropriate behavioral therapy platform for levodopa pharmacotherapy by evaluating its effect when administered in combination with behavioral platforms of varying intensities.Method A total of 161 treatment-seeking cocaine dependent subjects received sustained release levodopa/carbidopa (400/100mg bid, Sinemet) or placebo delivered in combination with Clinical Management (ClinMan); ClinMan+cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT); or ClinMan+CBT+voucher-based reinforcement therapy (VBRT) in a 12-week randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind (for medication condition) trial. Medication compliance was monitored with riboflavin (100mg/capsule) and the Medication Event Monitoring System. Protocol compliance was addressed in weekly, 10-min nurse-delivered ClinMan sessions. Weekly, 1-h CBT sessions focused on coping skills training. VBRT (with escalating reinforcer value) provided cash-valued vouchers contingent on cocaine-negative urine toxicology results. Urine benzoylecgonine assays collected thrice-weekly were analyzed by intention-to-treat criteria using generalized linear mixed models.Results Levodopa main effects were found on all outcome measures of cocaine use. Contrasts testing the levodopa-placebo difference within each behavioral platform found reliable effects, favoring levodopa, only in the VBRT platform. Levodopa treatment with vouchers produced higher proportions of cocaine-negative urines and longer periods of consecutive abstinence compared to other treatment combinations.Conclusion This is the first study to find a significant treatment effect for levodopa and, in doing so, to demonstrate that the magnitude of this effect is dependent upon conditions of the behavioral therapy platform. The data support use of levodopa with abstinence-based reinforcement therapy as one efficacious combination in cocaine dependence disorder treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.11.004

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Cocores JA, Gold MS, Pottash ALC. Dopaminergic treatments in cocaine withdrawal. Soc Neurosci Abstr. 1989;15:251. [Google Scholar]
  2. Dackis CA, Gold MS, Estroff TW, et al. Hyperprolactinemia in cocaine abuse. Soc Neurosci Abstr. 1984;10:1099. [Google Scholar]
  3. Marlatt GA, Gordon JR, editors. Relapse Prevention. Guilford Press; New York: 1985. [Google Scholar]
  4. SAS . The SAS System for Windows (Version 9.13) SAS Institute Inc.; Cary, NC: 2006. [Google Scholar]
  5. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1994-2004. National Admissions to Substance Abuse Treatment Services; Rockville, MD: 2006. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmitz, J. M., Mooney, M. E., Moeller, F. G., Stotts, A. L., Green, C., & Grabowski, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of Minnesota, Duluth (US)
Corresponding author
Schmitz, Joy M.
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-04
Volume
94
Issue
1-3
Pages
142-150
ISSN
0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069296272
Cited by
124
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p50da009262-20)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K02DA000403, #P50 DA009262, K02DA00403, K01DA019446, R01DA030787, P50-DA-9262)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
levodopa, cocaine dependence, cocaine dependence treatment, cognitive behavioral therapy, clinical management, dopamine precursor, medication adherence
MeSH terms
Adult, Combined Modality Therapy, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Levodopa, Male, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Compliance, Retention, Psychology, Severity of Illness Index, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Dopamine Agonists, Cocaine-Related Disorders, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review