Cited by 584Crime Patterns and InterventionsCriminal Justice and PenologyLaw, Economics, and Judicial Systems

The cost of crime to society: New crime-specific estimates for policy and program evaluation

Open access
McCollister, Kathryn E., French, Michael T., Fang, Hai·2010·Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Abstract

Estimating the cost to society of individual crimes is essential to the economic evaluation of many social programs, such as substance abuse treatment and community policing. A review of the crime-costing literature reveals multiple sources, including published articles and government reports, which collectively represent the alternative approaches for estimating the economic losses associated with criminal activity. Many of these sources are based upon data that are more than 10 years old, indicating a need for updated figures. This study presents a comprehensive methodology for calculating the cost to society of various criminal acts. Tangible and intangible losses are estimated using the most current data available. The selected approach, which incorporates both the cost-of-illness and the jury compensation methods, yields cost estimates for more than a dozen major crime categories, including several categories not found in previous studies. Updated crime cost estimates can help government agencies and other organizations execute more prudent policy evaluations, particularly benefit-cost analyses of substance abuse treatment or other interventions that reduce crime.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.12.002

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aggravated assault costs $120,166 per act.

    “Violent offenses including murder, rape/sexual assault, and aggravated assault generated the highest cost-per-offense ($10.09 million, $270,352, and $120,166 per act, respectively).”

    From Monetary conversion factors for economic evaluations of substance use disorders (2017) · cites this paper as McCollister, French, & Fang, 2010

    The Results (section 5; page unavailable) give a total societal cost of $107,020 per aggravated assault, not $120,166. The same section reports $115,365 under an alternative sensitivity analysis, also below the claimed figure. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Rape or sexual assault costs $270,352 per act.

    “Violent offenses including murder, rape/sexual assault, and aggravated assault generated the highest cost-per-offense ($10.09 million, $270,352, and $120,166 per act, respectively).”

    From Monetary conversion factors for economic evaluations of substance use disorders (2017) · cites this paper as McCollister, French, & Fang, 2010

    Section 5 (Results; page not provided) gives the paper’s per-offense cost for rape/sexual assault as $240,776, not $270,352. Its third sensitivity analysis gives $244,126, also not the claimed amount. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Murder has the highest cost per offense at $10.09 million.

    “Violent offenses including murder, rape/sexual assault, and aggravated assault generated the highest cost-per-offense ($10.09 million, $270,352, and $120,166 per act, respectively).”

    From Monetary conversion factors for economic evaluations of substance use disorders (2017) · cites this paper as McCollister, French, & Fang, 2010

    The Results section (Table 5 discussion; page unavailable) ranks murder as the highest-cost offense, supporting that part of the claim. But the paper estimates about $8.98 million per murder in 2008 dollars, not $10.09 million; its figures for rape/sexual assault and aggravated assault also differ from those in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.93)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Robbery, arson, and motor vehicle theft have cost-per-offense between $12,095 and $47,507 per act.

    “Robbery, arson, and motor vehicle theft have cost-per-offense of between $12,095 and $47,507 per act.”

    From Monetary conversion factors for economic evaluations of substance use disorders (2017) · cites this paper as McCollister, French, & Fang, 2010

    The Results section reports $42,310 per robbery and $21,103 per arson, both within the claimed range. But the Discussion reports $10,772 per motor vehicle theft, below the claimed $12,095 lower bound; the paper does not give the claimed endpoints for these three offenses. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The remaining crimes including stolen property, household burglary, embezzlement, forgery and counterfeiting, fraud, vandalism, and larceny/theft range between $3,966 and $8,953 per act.

    “The remaining crimes including stolen property, household burglary, embezzlement, forgery and counterfeiting, fraud, vandalism, and larceny/theft ranged between $3,966 and $8,953 per act.”

    From Monetary conversion factors for economic evaluations of substance use disorders (2017) · cites this paper as McCollister, French, & Fang, 2010

    The Results section reports per-offense costs for the listed crime categories, but not the claimed $3,966–$8,953 range. It gives $3,532 for larceny/theft, $6,462 for household burglary, and less than $8,000 each for stolen property, vandalism, forgery and counterfeiting, embezzlement, and fraud. The crime categories and per-act framing are supported; the numerical range is not. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCollister, K. E., French, M. T., & Fang, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Colorado School of Public Health (US)
Corresponding author
McCollister, Kathryn E.
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-04
Volume
108
Issue
1-2
Pages
98-109
ISSN
0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2167894329
Cited by
584
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 12
FWCI
60.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Justice
  • Federal Emergency Management Agency
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA018645, K01DA013962, K01 DA13962)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Keywords
crime costs, crime types, addiction treatment, community policing, cost-benefit analysis, crime prevention programs, policy evaluation
MeSH terms
Costs and Cost Analysis, Crime, Criminal Law, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Homicide, Humans, Prisoners, Prisons, Public Policy, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Program Evaluation, Models, Economic, Crime Victims

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review