Cited by 22Cognitive Functions and MemorySmoking Behavior and CessationDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Smoking-related prospective memory deficits in a real-world task

Heffernan, T.M., O’Neill, T.S., Moss, M.·2012·Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Abstract

Background Smokers, previous smokers and a never smoked group were compared on self-reported and real world prospective memory (PM - the cognitive ability of remembering to carry out particular actions at some future point in time).Methods Twenty-seven current smokers, 24 people who had never smoked and 18 previous smokers were compared using an existing groups design. Scores on the long and short term PM subscales of the Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ) and scores on a Real World Prospective Memory Task (RWPMT) constituted the dependent measures. Smoking and other drug use were assessed by a Recreational Drug Use Questionnaire. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale gauged levels of anxiety and depression. The National Adult Reading Test measured IQ, and retrospective memory was measured using the PRMQ. Gender, age, anxiety and depression, IQ, alcohol use and the retrospective memory scores, were measured as covariates and controlled for in the analysis.Results A series of univariate ANCOVAs were applied to the main PM data across the three groups, controlling for variations in age, gender, mood, IQ, alcohol use and retrospective memory scores. These revealed no significant between-group differences on self-reported PM; however smokers recalled significantly fewer action-location combinations than the never smoked and previous smoker groups on the objective RWPMT.Conclusions Existing smokers showed reduced performance on RWPMT when compared to the never smoked group and previous smokers. Real-world PM impairments should be added to a growing list of neuropsychological sequelae associated with persistent smoking.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.06.010

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heffernan, T. M., O’Neill, T. S., & Moss, M.
Affiliations
Northumbria University (GB)
Corresponding author
Heffernan, T.M.
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
120
Issue
1-3
Pages
1-6
ISSN
0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046104260
Cited by
22
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
smoking, prospective memory, smokers, former smokers, never smokers, anxiety, depression, alcohol consumption
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Intelligence Tests, Male, Memory Disorders, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Smoking, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review