Cited by 525HIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Strategies used by people who inject drugs to avoid stigma in healthcare settings

Open access
Biancarelli, Dea L., Biello, Katie B., Childs, Ellen, Drainoni, M., Salhaney, Peter, Edeza, Alberto, Mimiaga, Matthew J, Saitz, Richard +1 more·2019·Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Abstract

Background People who inject drugs (PWID) have limited engagement in healthcare services and report frequent experiences of stigma and mistreatment when accessing services. This paper explores the impact of stigma against injection drug use on healthcare utilization among PWID in the U.S. Northeast.Methods We recruited PWID through community-based organizations (CBOs; e.g., syringe service programs). Participants completed brief surveys and semi-structured interviews lasting approximately 45 min exploring HIV risk behaviors and prevention needs. Thematic analysis examined the emergent topic of stigma experiences in relation to healthcare utilization.Results Among 33 PWID (55% male; age range 24-62 years; 67% White; 24% Latino), most used heroin (94%) and injected at least daily (60%). Experiences of dehumanization in healthcare settings were common, with many participants perceiving that they had been treated unfairly or discriminated against due to their injection drug use. As participants anticipated this type of stigma from healthcare providers, they developed strategies to avoid it, including delaying presenting for healthcare, not disclosing drug use, downplaying pain, and seeking care elsewhere. In contrast to large institutional healthcare settings, participants described non-stigmatizing environments within CBOs, where they experienced greater acceptance, mutual respect, and stronger connections with staff.Conclusions Stigma against injection drug use carries important implications for PWID health. Increased provider training on addiction as a medical disorder could improve PWID healthcare experiences, and integrating health services into organizations frequented by PWID could increase utilization of health services by this population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.01.037

Cites

79 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Building rapport and trust through low-threshold, non-stigmatizing services in community-based organizations, rather than in large institutional clinics, helps mitigate the anticipated discrimination that often deters these patients from seeking care.

    “Building rapport and trust through low-threshold, non-stigmatizing services in community-based organizations, rather than in large institutional clinics, helps mitigate the anticipated discrimination that often deters these patients from seeking care [46].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN). 2010 The DAWN Report: highlights of the 2010 Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) findings on drug-related emergency department visits. Retrieved October 2, 2018, from https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/DAWN096/DAWN096/SR096EDHighlights2010.htm 27631059

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Biancarelli, D. L., Biello, K. B., Childs, E., Drainoni, M., Salhaney, P., Edeza, A., Mimiaga, M. J., Saitz, R., & Bazzi, A. R.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Bazzi, Angela R.
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
198
Pages
80-86
ISSN
0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2921016611
Cited by
524
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 92 · 2024: 109 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 8
FWCI
36.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Providence/Boston Center for AIDS Research (P30AI042853)
  • NIH/NIDA (K01DA043412)
  • BU Peter Paul Career Development Professorship
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
people who inject drugs, stigma, health care utilization, dehumanization, community organizations, syringe services programs, HIV risk behavior, provider training, integrated care
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, New England, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, HIV Infections, Substance Abuse, Intravenous, Drug Users, Young Adult, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review