Cited by 17Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentHomelessness and Social Issues

Independent effects of entering recovery as a young versus older adult on long-term functioning and quality of life: Results from a U.S. national study of recovering persons

Open access
Kelly, John F., Greene, M. Claire, Abry, Alexandra, Bergman, Brandon G.·2021·Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Abstract

Background For physical health conditions, earlier intervention typically results in better prognoses and improved quality of life (QoL). Despite some evidence that early intervention yields better subsequent functioning too for behavioral health conditions like alcohol and other drug (AOD) disorders, less is known. This study examined the relationship between the life-stage at which individuals entered AOD recovery, demographic and clinical correlates, and its relationship to a variety of indices of current functioning, QoL and well-being.Method Nationally representative sample of U.S. adults who resolved an AOD problem (Weighted N = 1844). Structured regression analyses tested whether life-stage at which individuals entered recovery (i.e., as a young [18-30yrs,n = 746] vs. older [>30yrs,n = 1098] adult), was associated with current QoL, happiness, self-esteem, distress, and recovery capital, independent of confounders. Sensitivity analyses investigated effects during the first 5-years of recovery.Results Young adult recovery entry was independently associated with current employment, younger age of onset for primary substance, primary substance other than alcohol, and less lifetime psychiatric comorbidity. In fully-adjusted models examining indices of functioning, no association was found between life-stage at recovery entry and current self-esteem, happiness, or distress, but an association was found between young adult recovery entry and better current functioning and QoL. This effect was even more pronounced during the first 5-years of recovery.Conclusion Irrespective of current age, duration of recovery, and clinical markers of impairment, entering recovery as a young, versus older, adult, is associated with better subsequent QoL - an advantage that appears even more discernable early in recovery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108493

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Entering SUD treatment early is related to better long-term quality of life and functioning.

    “entering SUD treatment early has been related to better long-term quality of life and functioning (8)”

    From Initial insights from a quality improvement initiative to develop an evidence-informed young adult substance use program (2022) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Discussion reports that people who entered recovery as young adults had significantly better later quality of life and functioning than those who entered recovery as older adults. But the study examined when people entered recovery, not when they entered SUD treatment. Its Introduction reports benefits of earlier treatment from other studies, without establishing the claimed long-term quality-of-life finding for treatment entry. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Smith DC, 2018 Emerging issues in the emerging adult substance use field, Emerging adults and substance use disorder treatment: Developmental considerations and innovative approaches. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, US, pp. 261– 272.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kelly, J. F., Greene, M. C., Abry, A., & Bergman, B. G.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Kelly, John F.
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
219
Pages
108493
ISSN
0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3116183723
Cited by
17
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH096724)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (K24AA022136, K23AA025707)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
Keywords
young adults, older adults, quality of life, functioning, employment, age of onset of substance use, psychiatric comorbidity, happiness, self-esteem, distress, recovery capital, early intervention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Aged, Alcoholism, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Quality of Life, Self Concept, United States, Comorbidity, Substance-Related Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review